Wow. An early version of this post was replete with errors. And it's a tiny post! So apologies all around. A corrected version is below.
The near-real-time release of Supreme Court audio is a recent development, but the court (who knew?) has been taping its sessions for more than 60 years. And now, everyone else can enjoy reams and reams of historical arguments and cases that heretofore were only given to historians, and even then, quite selectively.
The Oyez Project, supported by the Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago-Kent College of Law, has mined the National Archives and put them all together — hundreds of cases since 1955. And the Supreme Court will add the cases to its website by next week, according to NPR.
If you've ever wanted to hear how Roe v. Wade was argued, your feast will be bountiful.
Or Gideon v. Wainwright, which formalized the right to counsel. Or Griswold v. Connecticut, which formalized the right to contraception and expanded the legal definition of the right to privacy. Or New York Times v. Sullivan, which clarified libel law. They're all there.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- How Israel's hawks intimidated and silenced the last remnants of the anti-war left
- Why your employer should clean your house and do your laundry
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- What you need to know before you support the police in Ferguson
- Why China thinks it could defeat the U.S. in battle
- The big policy question libertarians can't answer
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Welcome to the age of ambivalent feminism
- How the West produces jihadi tourists
Subscribe to the Week