Opinion Brief

Is America getting 'kicked out' of Iraq?

President Obama announces that all U.S. troops will leave Iraq by year's end. Actually, says Michele Bachmann, Iraqis are giving us the boot. Is she right?

U.S. soldiers take pictures before their departure from Iraq in July: On Friday, President Obama announced that the rest of U.S. troops will be home by the end of 2011.

U.S. soldiers take pictures before their departure from Iraq in July: On Friday, President Obama announced that the rest of U.S. troops will be home by the end of 2011. Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images SEE ALL 21 PHOTOS

Best Opinion:  Wash. Post, Foreign Policy, Amer. Spectator

Barack Obama, who made a name for himself with a passionate speech in 2002 arguing against the Iraq War before campaigning for president in 2008 on the promise that he'd end the war once and for all, announced on Friday that, "as promised, the rest of our troops in Iraq will come home by the end of the year." That timetable was actually set in place by a 2008 agreement George W. Bush signed with Iraq, which called for all troops to be out by year's end. In fact, the Obama team had been negotiating with Iraq for a few thousand U.S. troops to stay on past 2011. Iraq balked at American demands that U.S. troops retain legal immunity, and a new deal was scuttled. So really, the U.S. "is being kicked out by the very people that we liberated," says GOP presidential hopeful Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.). Is that a fair assessment?

America is being ejected due to Obama's ineptitude: This irresponsible withdrawal is worse than a politically motivated military retreat, says Jennifer Rubin at The Washington Post. If not for Team Obama's "inept negotiations," U.S. forces could have stayed on to help Iraqis and fend off Iran, as Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Malaki, U.S. generals, and apparently even Obama himself wanted. Congress should investigate this "bungled diplomacy."
"Obama: A dishonest withdrawal from Iraq"

Actually, this is cause for "real celebration": Pulling out by Jan. 1, 2012 "is the right decision, at the right time," says Marc Lynch at Foreign Policy. "It may have been forced upon the administration by Iraqi political realities," but that's the democracy we fought for. Except for some Iraqi elites who privately hoped U.S. troops would stay in larger numbers, our military isn't wanted or, increasingly, even needed. That's why Obama's negotiators "seem satisfied with the outcome, as they should."
"Yes, the U.S. is withdrawing from Iraq"

Good riddance to a bad situation: Let's be honest, says Reid Smith at The American Spectator. The withdrawal is an "absolutely political" move by Obama, aimed at his anti-war base. But it's also the only decision that makes sense, since America isn't willing to greatly expand our troop presence. Fewer than 5,000 troops would be nothing more than a polarizing target for politicians and armed militants. Iraq will stand or fall on its own now, and it's "just as well American soldiers and Marines do not remain as fodder."
"And that's a wrap in Iraq"

see 16 comments
opinion brief

Jon Stewart vs. Donald Rumsfeld

The former defense secretary faced a grilling on Iraq from the liberal-leaning talkshow host. Who came out on top?

Jon Stewart came out swinging during his extended 30-minute interview with former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

The video: "I know why you're here. And let me just deflate the tension right off the bat: Apology accepted." That's how Jon Stewart began his wide-ranging, confrontational interview with former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld — a favorite target for the... More

opinion brief

Is it right to execute Iraq's Tariq Aziz?

Russia and the Vatican lead calls for clemency for Saddam Hussein's former top aide

Tariq Aziz, pictured here in an Iraqi courtroom in 2004, was the lone Christian in Saddam Hussein's Sunni Muslim-dominated regime.

Tariq Aziz, the urbane PR man of Saddam Hussein's regime, has been sentenced to death by an Iraqi court for participating in the persecution of Shiites. But Russia and the Vatican are among many voices calling for clemency. Defenders point out that Aziz is in failing... More

opinion brief

Is post-war Iraq better off?

The end of U.S. combat operations in Iraq has prompted pundits to consider what we achieved in the battle-scarred country

U.S. troops invaded Iraq in March 2003. Since then, more than a trillion dollars has been spent, and 4,000 U.S troops lost.

After seven years, $1 trillion spent, and more than 4,400 soldiers lost, the U.S. has declared an end to combat operations in Iraq. The despot who tyrannized the country for decades has been deposed and executed, and the Iraqi people now have the right to choose... More

opinion brief

Obama's Iraq speech: First reactions

The president declared an end to combat in Iraq, saying it was time to focus on problems at home. Were the commentators impressed?

Obama addressed the nation from the Oval Office Tuesday night.

President Obama made his second primetime Oval Office address to the nation on Tuesday night, declaring an end to America's "combat mission" in Iraq. He said it is "time to turn the page" and focus on domestic problems, which have been "shortchanged" in a... More

opinion brief

Obama's Iraq drawdown speech: What he should say

Obama is giving an Oval Office address to mark the end of the U.S. combat mission in Iraq. Commentators weigh in on what to expect

Obama will address the nation from the Oval Office Tuesday night.

President Obama is giving his second Oval Office address Tuesday night, to mark the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq. As the U.S. passes this benchmark, what should Obama, a critic of both the war and the largely successful "surge," say to the nation... More

Facebook

Twitter

Stumble

Tumblr

RSS

Newsletter

See our bad opinions
Reader Poll Your Opinion Matters

Should the Plan B emergency contraceptive pill be sold in vending machines?

cockroach

A Madagascar hissing cockroach named after your valentine — and more in our collection of bizarrely elite consumer products