The Americans Elect flameout: Is there any hope for a third party?

Centrist pundits were excited about this year's online push to draft a viable third-party presidential candidate. The tallied votes show that they were the only ones

Best Opinion:  Wash. Post, Daily Beast, Slate

Americans Elect spent $35 million to get a credible third-party candidate on the 2012 presidential ballot, round up 420,000 online delegates, and bring a new breed of independent, direct democracy to America's two-party system. Early Tuesday morning, the group said everything has gone according to plan, except for one small detail: They don't have a candidate. Monday at midnight was the deadline for the competing candidates to get enough online votes — at least 10,000 — to qualify for the group's online convention in June. The highest vote-getter, former Louisiana Gov. Buddy Roemer (R), barely cracked 6,000. If a well-funded, well-organized, pundit-approved organization like Americans Elect can't succeed, is there any hope for the chimerical goal of a viable third party in U.S. politics?

This bodes very ill for third parties: If there were ever a year for a third party to make its mark, 2012 fit the bill, says Aaron Blake at The Washington Post. We're in a "time of historic unhappiness with Congress," and disheartened Americans say they want a third-party or independent choice for president. But no "big-name candidates" stepped up, so it seems that even with Americans Elect's fat bank account and a guaranteed spot on the ballot in at least 27 states, "the institutional and motivational barriers" to a viable third party are just too high.
"Americans Elect: The third party's latest death knell"

Don't count Americans Elect out yet: A lot of specific things went wrong this year, but the organizers aren't giving up, says John Avlon at The Daily Beast. There's still time to extend the qualifying deadline, or even recruit a real A-list candidate. Even if Americans Elect proves to be "an idea ahead of its time," or just too flawed to seize the moment, there's still "a deep need for increased constructive competition in our polarized political system." This big investment in a new kind of democracy will pay off, if not now then in an inevitable future reform effort.
"Americans Elect failure... threatens third-party dreams"

You can't buy a third-party president: The $8 million in seed money from hedge fund manager Peter Ackerman, plus $27 million from other donors, didn't buy a candidate, but it did buy a couple of "tips for the next coalition of enlightened people who want to save American democracy," says David Weigel at Slate. First, don't attempt grassroots democracy with "serious hedge fund" cash and a secretive cabal of organizers. More importantly, "you don't break the power of the parties by running in a presidential election." You start small, with Congress.
"Nobody for president"

 

Gary Johnson 2012: Could the Libertarian Party spoil the election?

A fiscally conservative, socially liberal former GOP candidate is making a third-party run for the White House — and hopes to participate in the fall presidential debates

Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson didn't have much luck in the Republican presidential race — rarely registering as more than an asterisk in the polls, and failing to qualify for nearly every debate — but he's done better since his December decision... More

Will Democrats regret holding their convention in North Carolina?

After Obama won the Tar Heel State in 2008, Democrats chose Charlotte for their 2012 convention. But now, North Carolina is leaning inhospitably red

If Democrats chose to hold their national convention in Charlotte, N.C., out of political considerations — as opposed to, say, the lovely weather and great hotels — "they goofed," says Stuart Rothenberg at Roll Call. President Obama narrowly won... More

Obama's re-election bid: Will being 'cooler' than Mitt Romney really help?

It didn't take slow-jamming the news with Jimmy Fallon to prove that Obama's hipper than Romney, but the cool factor could actually hurt the president's chances

There's a lot we don't, and can't, know about who will be president this time next year, but "here's a fundamental fact of the 2012 presidential race," says Chris Cillizza at The Washington Post: "President Obama is cool. Mitt Romney isn't." Obama slow-jams... More

Foreign policy: Would Romney and Obama govern differently?

Liberals worry that Romney is a dangerous hawk. Conservatives charge that Obama is a feckless weakling. But the candidates may be more similar than either side admits

After a string of successes abroad — most notably authorizing the killing of Osama bin Laden last year — polls show that President Obama has an edge over his Republican challenger when it comes to foreign policy. But that isn't stopping... More

Obama vs. Romney: Who's really anti-woman?

Facing a daunting lack of support among women, Mitt Romney tries to turn Democrats' charge of a GOP "war on women" back on Obama. Does he land his punch?

Democrats have been talking up a Republican "war on women" for weeks, pointing to GOP opposition to President Obama's mandate that insurance plans provide free contraception, as well as to Republican support for defunding Planned Parenthood and the slew of harsh... More