JPMorgan's billion-dollar loss: Time to break up the big banks?
A handful of mega-banks dotting the financial landscape are too big to fail, putting taxpayers and the global economy at risk every time they stumble
A protester stands outside the annual JPMorgan stockholders meeting Tuesday: Some observers argue that government watchdogs would need God-like powers to regulate such mega-banks effectively. Photo: AP Photo/Scott Iskowitz SEE ALL 36 PHOTOS
Best Opinion: National Review, NY Post, NY Times
In the aftermath of JPMorgan's $2 billion loss, which could bloat to as much as $4 billion in the coming weeks, critics of Wall Street have pressed the government to strengthen its oversight of the financial industry. But would that be enough to prevent a repetition of the financial crisis? Some say the very existence of JPMorgan and other too-big-to-fail banks represents a constant threat to the global economy — as well as the taxpayers who will have to rescue them if they collapse. Is the best solution to cut big banks down to size?
Yes. Regulation alone can't save the banks from themselves: JPMorgan's debacle shows that "there is no foolproof way to regulate banks," says Arnold King at The National Review. Government watchdogs would need "God-like powers" to prevent "errors in judgment, overconfidence, misguided innovation, or unforeseen events." At the very least, government regulators would have to know more about banking than the bankers themselves, and such brilliant regulators "might be rather difficult to find." JP Morgan is "about ten times as large as any bank ought to be," and the only way to protect the economy is to make banks smaller.
"Once again, break up the banks"
And the bankers can't be trusted: JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon "is the smartest guy in banking today," weathering the financial crisis better than any of his peers, says Charles Gasparino at The New York Post, and even he can lose billions of dollars on a dumb trade. It's clear that neither the government nor Wall Street can regulate the industry, and we shouldn't allow "so much risk to be housed in just a few large institutions like JPMorgan, Citigroup, and Bank of America." The failure of just one of these institutions will cause catastrophic "ripple effects in the global markets," meaning that taxpayers will have to foot the bill.
"Break up the banks"
Banks should return to their roots: Smaller isn't necessarily the only answer. "What banking most needs is to become boring, the way the business was before bankers became addicted to trading profits," says Joe Nocera at The New York Times. JPMorgan should be using its customer deposits to make loans, not investing in credit default swaps and other complex financial products that have the potential to explode. The government needs to take action to ensure that big commercial banks are discouraged from engaging in the casino-like game of investment banking.
"Make banking boring"
JPMorgan's shocking $2 billion loss: Proof we need stronger financial reform?
Four years after the financial crisis, another major bank gets caught making huge, risky bets that went sour. Critics say it's time for a serious crackdown

On Thursday, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon revealed that the banking giant lost a whopping $2 billion due to a massive trade that went sour, and that the losses could climb by another $1 billion in the coming days. Dimon attributed the loss to "errors, sloppiness...
MoreShould investors be allowed to bet on the 2012 election?
Investors complain after the feds bar them from trading contracts that pay off, or don't, depending on which candidate wins the White House

This week, government regulators told a Chicago futures exchange that it can't take bets on who will win the 2012 elections. The North American Derivatives Exchange, or Nadex, had applied for permission to let people buy and sell contracts for as little as $100... More
Is Wall Street hooked on the Fed's 'monetary morphine'?
Stock markets jump every time the central bank hints that it will continue to support the economy, and some say the Fed is creating a a dangerous dependency

On Monday, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke painted a "notably downbeat" picture of the U.S. economy, saying it was growing too slowly to repair the battered jobs market on its own. But instead of darkening the mood on Wall Street, stocks shot up, and the...
MoreHank Paulson's 'astonishing' insider tip to Wall Street
Bloomberg reports that as Treasury secretary, Paulson gave a potentially lucrative heads-up to hedge fund managers. Should we be outraged?

Mere days after revealing that big Wall Street banks made $13 billion in secret profits off the Federal Reserve's $7.7 trillion bid to shore up the financial system in 2008-09, Bloomberg Markets is back with a "rather astonishing" scoop on then-Treasury... More
Will cutting 30,000 jobs save Bank of America?
The struggling banking giant tries to save $5 billion a year by laying off 10 percent of its staff

Bank of America, the nation's largest lender, announced on Monday that it will cut 30,000 jobs — 10 percent of its workforce — over the next few years. The layoffs should save the company $5 billion annually by 2014, as the massive bank trims its... More

































Follow Us: