Skyrocketing tuition: Is punishing expensive colleges the answer?
President Obama tries to pressure colleges into taming their wildly soaring tuition costs. Good luck with that, say dismissive critics
President Obama wants to reduce higher education tuition and fees, which averaged $8,244 at public universities last year, and $28,500 at private colleges. Photo: Bill Pugliano/Getty Images SEE ALL 31 PHOTOS
Best Opinion: Chicago Trib, Forbes, Albany Times Union
In his State of the Union address in January, President Obama put colleges and universities on notice: "If you can't stop tuition from going up, the funding you get from taxpayers will go down." College "can't be a luxury," he added, and affordable tuition is "an economic imperative" for families and the nation alike. Obama has since backed up his words with proposals, including "scorecards" that would let students better compare schools' costs and value, and continued threats to shift federal dollars away from schools that don't control costs. Should pricey schools really be punished?
Obama's plan won't work: "'Punishing' schools that don't control costs" is futile, because most rising costs have nothing to do with the colleges themselves, say Michael McPherson and Sandy Baum in the Chicago Tribune. The main cause is the decision by cash-strapped states to slash higher-ed funding. "Everyone would like a magic bullet that would dramatically reduce the cost of educating students." But the truth is, high-quality education costs money, and nobody wants to pay for it. Obama can't punish schools into changing that reality.
"Can we keep colleges affordable?"
It would work if Obama went farther: Oklahoma State's Vance Fried found that schools can "provide a first-class undergraduate education for only $6,700 a year," says Daniel Freedman at Forbes. His recipe — slash university administrations, increase class sizes, and separate research from teaching — won't be popular. But if colleges want federal money, they need to prove Prof. Fried wrong. And Obama should boldly challenge them to do so.
"The Obama deal: Harvard for $6,700 a year?"
Let's give transparency a try first: Obama's threat to cut federal funding to schools that don't control tuition costs is "premature" at best, says the Albany, N.Y., Times Union in an editorial. But we applaud his "call for greater transparency" on the value of different colleges. Using a scorecard that compares schools by the amount of debt you'll incur, your chances of graduating, and the odds of getting a job is a no-brainer. Once would-be applicants are armed with that data, the marketplace might impose "an adjustment in college cost inflation" on its own.
"Cheer, cheer for Transparency U."
Will the NCAA finally fix college sports?
After a two-day retreat, the NCAA pledges bold, sweeping reform for its broken athletics system... but haven't we heard this all before?

For decades, college athletics and the body that governs them, the NCAA, have been plagued by scandal, arbitrary rules and punishments, shady academics standards, and the tension-filled irony that student-athletes bring in millions of dollars while not being able... More
Should college students get food stamps?
Young scholars protest after Michigan kicks 30,000 of them out of the state's food assistance program

College students aren't typically eligible for federal food assistance, but in Michigan, many of them qualified for assistance under special rules — until now. The cash-strapped state has cut roughly 30,000 college students from its state food stamps... More
Single-sex dorms: A cure for binge drinking?
In an effort to eradicate excessive partying and promiscuity, Catholic University announces plans to phase out co-ed housing

Will single-sex dorms help stop the over-the-top drinking and casual sex plaguing college campuses? Catholic University of America seems to think so. In a Wall Street Journal editorial, the college's president announced that the university will revert to single... More
Should kids get $100,000 to drop out of college?
Billionaire Peter Thiel is paying 24 overachievers to leave school and focus on entrepreneurial pursuits. Will this create the next Mark Zuckerberg... or just waste talent?

On Wednesday, Peter Thiel, the libertarian billionaire who founded PayPal and was an early investor in Facebook, announced the first class of his "Thiel Fellows." The 24 overachievers, all under the age of 20 and in possession of ridiculously impressive resumes... More
Is education the next bubble?
Higher learning is just an overpriced, speculative investment that typically rewards graduates with dismal career prospects, says billionaire Peter Thiel

Billionaire libertarian businessman Peter Thiel, the founder and former CEO of PayPal, is perhaps best known as the venture capitalist who gave Facebook the angel investment it needed to really get started. But, increasingly, he's getting attention for his controversial... More


































Follow Us: