Unemployment benefits: Should drug testing be required?

Under new legislation, the jobless will have to undergo drug testing in certain cases. If Republicans had gotten their way, it would have been all cases

Best Opinion:  Dallas Morning News, U.S. News & World Report, NY Times

In a rare show of bipartisanship, Congress passed a measure extending unemployment benefits through the end of 2012 — but the two parties made compromises to get the legislation through. Controversially, for instance, the bill allows states to subject certain applicants to drug testing: Namely, those who were laid off for flunking an employer's drug test, and those seeking jobs that require such tests. An earlier version passed by the GOP-controlled House would have allowed states to drug-test all applicants. Should Republicans have stuck to their guns?

Yes. Businesses shouldn't have to subsidize illegal activity: Employers pay taxes to maintain the insurance fund, and they can't be asked to prop up "someone's drug habit," says Bill Hammond at The Dallas Morning News. Furthermore, if workers can prove that they are drug-free, it will "greatly increase the chance that they will be hired." In fact, drug-testing would "eliminate the people who aren't ready and available for work," and strengthen the job market.
"Why drug-testing job seekers matters"

Drug-testing is costly — and it just stigmatizes the jobless: A drug-testing regimen only "perpetuates myths and scapegoats the unemployed," says Christine L. Owens at U.S. News & World Report. These proposals "stem from false assumptions that the unemployed are lazy drug users who prefer unemployment checks to paychecks." And drug-testing is expensive at $25-$75 a pop: "Cash-strapped" states would have to put up millions to administer the program. "Is there a more frivolous or unnecessary way to spend taxpayer money?"
"Say no to drug testing the unemployed"

And blanket drug-testing would be unconstitutional: Remember, the Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures, writes Andrew Rosenthal at The New York Times. A blanket drug-testing requirement "falls clearly" into the category of an unreasonable search, since the government has no "probable cause" to suspect all unemployment benefit applicants of abusing illegal drugs.
"Drug-testing and probable cause, a response to readers"

 

The 'unequivocally strong' January jobs report

Employers go on an unexpected hiring spree in January, pushing the unemployment rate to its lowest point in three years. But is all the news good?

Happy new year! The Labor Department announced on Friday that the economy gained an "incredible" 243,000 jobs in the first month of 2012, shocking many analysts who expected modest gains of about 150,000 jobs. The unexpected January hiring spree pushed the unemployment... More

Obama's jobs plan: Will either side blink?

Washington faces yet another stalemate, as the GOP rejects parts of the president's jobs package and the White House vows not to carve up the bill

President Obama is touring the country to ramp up public pressure on Congress to pass his American Jobs Act — and that means all of the bill, not just the parts that are acceptable to House Republicans. "It's not an à la carte menu," said... More

Paying for Obama's jobs bill: Tax hikes for the rich?

The president wants to fund his $447 billion jobs bill by scrapping tax breaks for hedge fund managers — and families making north of $250,000 a year

On Monday, Obama budget director Jack Lew explained how the president proposes to pay for his $447 billion American Jobs Act. The big takeaway: Tax increases for wealthier Americans. Obama's plan would limit itemized deductions for families earning more than... More

Obama's jobs plan: 'Dead on arrival'?

Republicans and business owners are dismissing the president's proposal to fight unemployment — before Obama even sends it to Congress

President Obama is sending his jobs plan to Congress on Monday, but House Republican leaders have already signaled that they intend to cherrypick parts they like instead of voting on the entire package. "A lot of this plan is probably dead on arrival," says Rep... More

The 'horrific' August jobs report

The U.S. economy failed to add any new jobs last month — the worst showing in nearly a year. Does the report offer anything resembling a silver lining?

Zero. That's the number of jobs that were added to the U.S. economy in August, according to a report released Friday morning by the Labor Department. Though economists had expected a modest gain of 60,000 jobs — far fewer than the 150,000-plus new jobs needed... More