The U.N.'s last-minute climate deal: 'Pitiful'?
After several days of tense negotiations in South Africa, Ban Ki-moon and Co. avoid going home empty-handed. But what did they really accomplish?
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon at December's climate change conference in South Africa: World leaders salvaged a last-minute compromise, but critics say it's not nearly enough. Photo: NIC BOTHMA/epa/Corbis SEE ALL 57 PHOTOS
Best Opinion: Guardian, Economist, TIME
After three sleepless nights, delegates at a United Nations climate conference in Durban, South Africa, reached a last-minute compromise on Sunday. Among other things, they finalized an agreement, spelled out at a meeting last year, to create a fund transferring billions of dollars from rich countries to poor ones. That money will help poor countries make the switch to cleaner energy sources. But the negotiators failed to establish strict new targets to limit global warming. Does that make the deal a failure?
This compromise accomplishes nothing: How "pitiful," says Damian Carrington at Britain's Guardian. For years, we've needed a global plan to "tackle climate change." But all we really got out of Durban was a squishy commitment to devising a strategy by 2015 and implementing it by 2020. That delay "ensures beyond doubt that our children will be worse off than we have been," because they face an environmental challenge that makes Europe's financial problems look like peanuts.
"Climate deal: A guarantee our children will be worse off than us"
Actually, the deal exceeded expectations: "With many governments distracted by pressing economic worries," we're lucky to get any deal at all, says The Economist. In addition to the new fund, European nations agreed to continue cutting emissions under the Kyoto Protocol, which was set to expire next year. In exchange, China, India, and other developing nations that had "no emissions-cutting burden" under Kyoto have agreed to share the pain under the next treaty, which should kick in by 2020. That's not a solution, but it's a start.
"A deal in Durban"
Global summits won't solve our climate problem: As usual, the climate diplomats "fudged" or "punted" the important issues, says Bryan Walsh at TIME. Sure, they managed to "stave off the total collapse of the U.N. climate process." But the truth is, our global league of nations won't be the hero that saves our planet, "if it's to be saved at all. The hard work will be done elsewhere: In national legislatures, in statehouses, in laboratories, and inside each person." The question is, are we up to the task?
"U.N. global-warming talks: Good for diplomats, indifferent for the climate"
Could Texas' mega-drought last until 2020?
A climatologist sparks debate by predicting that the Lone Star State's historic drought could persist for another decade

Climatologist John Nielsen-Gammon is predicting that Texas' devastating drought could last until 2020. The dangerously dry conditions have already caused $5.2 billion in damage to crops and livestock, along with a host of "out-of-control" wildfires. More than ... More
Can Al Gore's '24 Hours of Reality' convert climate skeptics?
The environmental evangelist launches a round-the-clock initiative to raise awareness of global warming

Former Vice President Al Gore is launching a multimedia blitz this week to convince skeptics that man-made climate change is causing droughts, floods, wildfires, and other disasters. The project, 24 Hours of Reality, will kick off Wednesday with the first of 24... More
Green war: Al Gore vs. Barack Obama
In a scathing Rolling Stone essay, America's most famous climate-change activist slams President Obama. How much will Gore's criticisms hurt?

Former Vice President Al Gore has launched a "friendly fire" attack on President Obama, criticizing his record on environmental issues in a 7,000-word Rolling Stone article. Admittedly, the president faced some "incredible challenges" when he entered office, Gore... More
Can Porsche's $845,000 hybrid supercar save the planet?
The German company's latest speedster can go from zero to 60 in little more than three seconds... and gets 94 miles to the gallon. If only it were a wee bit more affordable

The image: The Porsche 918 Spyder is no ordinary super-car. (See a full-sized photo below.) Unlike the gas-guzzling performance vehicles of yesteryear, the new Spyder is a plug-in hybrid that gets 94 miles to the gallon after a three-hour charge. But its planet... More
Is climate change to blame for the Brisbane floods?
As floods continue to spread across Australia, rising global temperatures are being cited as a cause

As Australia's deadly floods continued to spread this week, swollen rivers forced the evacuation of several more towns, exacerbating a natural disaster that has already killed 30 people and driven tens of thousands from their homes. Damage from the weeks of flooding... More



































Follow Us: