Sarah Silverman's 'vile' before-and-after abortion photos

The comedian is no stranger to controversy, but even some of her fans are questioning whether her latest stunt went over the line

Best Opinion:  Big Hollywood, Daily Mail, Babble

The image: The comedian Sarah Silverman just fired the latest salvo in the so-called War on Women. Known for making edgy jokes about rape and the Holocaust, Silverman created an uproar by tweeting a fake before-and-after picture of herself with the caption, "Got a quickie aborsh in case R v W gets overturned." Referring to Republican promises to roll back the landmark 1973 Roe v Wade decision that legalized abortion, the "before" picture shows her with a distended belly (taken, she says, just after she ate a bloating burrito), while her stomach is flat in the "after" image. 

The reaction: Silverman's "brand of abortion-based wittiness" is "vile" and "disturbing," says Jeannie Deangelis at Big Hollywood. While she has drawn support for "voicing liberal pro-choice beliefs," some are condemning her "insensitivity" to a subject that is "no laughing matter," says Olivia Fleming at The Daily Mail. Even her fans might conclude that she's gone "too far," says Kaydi Poirier at Hollywood Life. Actually, people are missing the whole point of the stunt, says Meredith Carroll at Babble, which is to make light of the perception on the right that the "pro-choice movement is all about… killing life at every opportunity." 

Sarah Silverman on WhoSay

 

Time to outlaw 'wrongful birth' lawsuits?

Oregon parents say they would have aborted had a lab test correctly revealed that their daughter would be born with Down syndrome — and win a $2.9 million lawsuit

A jury last week awarded an Oregon couple $2.9 million for the "wrongful birth" of their 4-year-old daughter, who has Down syndrome. The parents, Ariel and Deborah Levy, say that they would have aborted the pregnancy had they known the child would be born with... More

Is killing newborns really 'no different' than abortion?

A paper in an ethics journal argues that neither fetuses nor newborns are "actual persons" yet, so the same rules should apply to both

Two ethicists from Australia's Melbourne University have inspired a fierce backlash by suggesting that killing newborn babies "should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is." The professors, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva, argue in an article... More

Did the Komen charity's Planned Parenthood diss backfire?

The pink-ribboned Susan G. Komen for the Cure breast-cancer charity says it dumped Planned Parenthood to distance itself from controversy. Whoops

Until this week, the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation was a widely admired, largely apolitical breast-cancer charity, best known for its pink ribbons and charity races. Then it pulled the plug on most of its breast-screening grants to Planned Parenthood,... More

Twin 'reduction': Is aborting one twin and not the other unethical?

A controversial procedure is adding a new twist to the already fractious debate in the abortion battle

In The New York Times Sunday Magazine, Ruth Padawer reports on the rise of a procedure known as "twin reduction," or the selective abortion of one of two fetuses. Advances in reproductive medicine and fertility treatments have created a strange paradox, Padawer... More

The rise of the 'telemedicine' abortion: Is it safe?

A new study finds that pharmaceutically induced abortions are safe without a doctor in the room, but that hasn't calmed opponents of "robo-abortions"

Technologies like robotics and online teleconferences are letting medical practitioners remotely use "telemedicine" to practice surgery, consult with patients, treat battlefield wounds, and complete other health care tasks when they can't perform them in person... More