President Obama has found time to meet with Hugo Chávez, Daniel Ortega, and Vladimir Putin, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial, but he can't be bothered to spend a few minutes with the Dalai Lama, "a peaceful religious leader who has for decades been a friend to the United States and an advocate of human rights for China's 6 million Tibetans." The White House is trying to avoid offending Beijing, but rewarding China's bullying will just make matters worse.
In a rare burst of bipartisanship, said David L. Phillips in The Boston Globe, Republicans and Democrats alike are criticizing Obama for "kow-towing to China." But the decision to defer a meeting with the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader "is based on careful calculation. Instead of a photo-opportunity with the Dalai Lama, the administration believes it would be better to focus on diplomacy to restart negotiations between the Chinese government and the Dalai Lama’s envoys that were suspended last year."
"Of course, I understand the move diplomatically," said Ethan Nichtern in BeliefNet. "Pride and appearances are huge in diplomatic relations, especially with the Chinese. But what about standing up for truth, fairness, justice, interdependence?" If you don't stand tall on those values, "you have no real strength when it comes time to negotiate."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why you shouldn't eat dog. Not even once.
- How U.S. special forces are preparing for the worst-case scenario in North Korea
- Here's the schedule very successful people follow every day
- I hate Ayn Rand — but here's why my fellow conservatives love her
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- 10 things you need to know today: July 25, 2014
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- Why are so many parents being arrested?
- How social conservatives became a minority in need of protection
- Grammar quiz: Do you know the passive voice?
Subscribe to the Week