The verb "unfriend," which refers to the act of deleting someone from one's list of acquaintances on Facebook, has been named the New Oxford American Dictionary's "Word of the Year." In making the selection, NOAD's editors look for terms that enjoy both a strong current popularity and a potential for longevity. Past picks have included "podcast" (2005) and "blogger" (1998). Is "unfriend" a worthy choice, or just a lexicological flash in the pan? (Watch Dr. Laura field an "unfriend" question while walking her dog, Bebe)
"Unfriend" is an uninspired pick: It's an "ugly word," says Richard McManus on ReadWriteWeb. "For that reason it shouldn't be Word of the Year." Besides, the word doesn't have much value for non-Facebook users: "I don't think my Mum or Dad would be familiar with the term."
"Unfriending: Are people online shedding friends?"
At least it wasn't "sexting": You're lucky the NOAD picked "unfriend," said Devin Coldewey at Crunchgear. The runners up are "groaners". Can you really see "intexticated," "sexting" or "funemployed" lasting long, let alone the "infernal bird-based jargon" of Twitter users? Compared to those, unfriend is a "worthy choice" and "one for the ages."
"Word of the year an unreliable but fascinating barometer of tech"
It's just a marketing stunt: Word of the Year? How about "Scam of the Year," writes Adrian Chen at Gawker. Just look at some of the previous winners, such as "locavore" in 2007 and "carbon neutral" in 2006. This award is just an "excuse" for bloggers and journalists to rewrite "hacky trend pieces" from that year. It's nothing but a "silly marketing ploy" for the NOAD.
"The Oxford University Press word of the year is a huge scam"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Obama just kneecapped Jeb Bush and Chris Christie's 2016 prospects
- 6 tiny scientific mistakes that created huge disasters
- 10 classic Sesame Street moments we wouldn't show today's kids
- It's official: The religious right is calling it quits
- 10 things you need to know today: November 21, 2014
- The Hunger Games: Mockingjay — Part 1: 10 major differences between the book and the movie
- What could happen if the Supreme Court rules against ObamaCare
- The dangerously childish morality of liberal ObamaCare supporters
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- The slippery slope of Twitter's attempts to stop harassment against women
Subscribe to the Week