If given the choice between a "tremendous professional triumph" and a "severe personal blow," which would you take? That's the "philosophic question" exercising David Brooks in The New York Times. The face of the actress Sandra Bullock stares out from almost every celebrity magazine on the newsstand this week, as revelations of her husband's infidelities pile up. But Bullock's award for "Best Actress" at this year's Oscars will provide scant relief from her personal turmoil, says Brooks. The greatest happiness in life comes from "personal relationships," but it's amazing, writes Brooks, how often we "pay attention to the wrong things." An excerpt:
"Most people vastly overestimate the extent to which more money would improve our lives. Most schools and colleges spend too much time preparing students for careers and not enough preparing them to make social decisions. Most governments release a ton of data on economic trends but not enough on trust and other social conditions.
"In short, modern societies have developed vast institutions oriented around the things that are easy to count, not around the things that matter most. They have an affinity for material concerns and a primordial fear of moral and social ones."
SEE THE WEEK'S RELATED COVERAGE:
• Michelle "Bombshell" McGee and 7 other swastika scandals
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How liberals are unwittingly paving the way for the legalization of adult incest
- Watch out, China — America is working on dogfighting drones
- Why you probably don't have Ebola — even if you shook hands with America's 'patient zero'
- Libertarianism's terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea
- Ted Cruz is the new Sarah Palin
- How the Simpsons/Family Guy crossover revealed the worst of both shows
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- Why America won't have enough money to battle ISIS
Subscribe to the Week