n April 12, President Obama will meet more than 40 world leaders to discuss what he has called one of the four most important goals of his presidency: Nuclear disarmament. But the idea has its share of dissenters. "Skeptics of a nuclear-free world [say] such a goal is politically impossible and practically dangerous," says Robert Marquand in the Christian Science Monitor.
"The road to zero...faces a silo of skepticism, inertia, and practical and psychological complexities," Marquand says. "States like India and others see nuclear status as a matter of prestige. China isn't yet ready for disarmament. Smaller states view nuclear weapons as a hedge against large states with hefty conventional armies. Nor are Pentagon strategists dancing in their bunkered hallways about zero nukes.
"Some analysts argue that if nukes are outlawed then only outlaws will have nukes – the nations that don't conform to international treaties...Sen. John Kerry, though a supporter of no nukes, notes that you can't get to zero unless everyone goes there. 'The road to zero does not run through a nuclear Iran,' he says."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Who are the real gay marriage bigots?
- Watch The Daily Show mock Fox News' confused man-crush on Vladimir Putin
- Why is American internet so slow?
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Don't worry: World War III will almost certainly never happen
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- How to take the perfect profile picture for online dating, according to science
- Religious liberty should be a liberal value, too
- 10 things you need to know today: March 7, 2014
- The Daily Show's Aasif Mandvi dismantles another ObamaCare myth
Subscribe to the Week