The voters of Fremont, Nebraska (pop. 25,000) this week passed an ordinance that would prevent illegal immigrants from renting property or getting a job in the community. The measure requires businesses to verify citizenship of all workers, and renters to obtain a license from the local police department. While supporters say the law is an appropriate response to lax federal enforcement, the Nebraska American Civil Liberties Union argues it is unconstitutional and plans to mount a legal challenge. Is Fremont's new law smart policy? (Watch a local report about Fremont's new law)
Fremont is setting a dangerous precedent: This "outrageous" measure "ought to worry Americans everywhere," says former GOP congressman Bob Barr in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Between this and "the Arizona law," an increasing number of Americans are showing a "deeply troublesome" willingness to "grant far-reaching — even arbitrary powers" to law enforcement. If this continues, "our country and our Constitution are in imminent danger."
"Latest anti-immigration laws reek of 'Big Brother-ism'"
If you want something done right, do it yourself: Illegal immigration is a real and serious problem, says The Daily Republic (Mitchell, SD) in an editorial. And since the "federal government" has proven itself incapable of "enforcing its own existing immigration laws," the residents of Fremont came up with "their own methods to curb a rise in foreigners living and working illegally in our country." What's wrong with that?
"Acts to curb illegal aliens aren't racism"
The law is racist and abhorrent: The laws of sort passed by Fremont voters "effectively criminalise the entire Latino community," says Queen Emily at Feministe. Sadly, the town seems intent on "purging" itself of undocumented immigrants. Let's hope the legal challenges are successful, "because the spread of these laws must be stopped."
"Stop right there..."
This "money saving" bill will have the opposite effect: Backers of this law have been arguing "that illegal immigration is costing local taxpayers a lot of money," says Andrea Nill at Think Progress. But odds are good that passing a law of "questionable legality" will end up costing them "a lot more." Prolonged court battles, after all, aren't cheap. "Unfortunately, the only winners" in this situation will be the lawyers.
"Following the approval of anti-immigrant measure..."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- The latent sexism of the male marriage proposal
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Bush vs. Clinton in 2016 is the perfect way to make millennials hate politics even more
- The hilarious hypocrisy of Republicans complaining about the imperial presidency
- After Ferguson: Stop deferring to the cops
- This judge is the reason we're still fighting over net neutrality
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Diagnosing the Home Alone burglars' injuries: A professional weighs in
- The week's best photojournalism
- The real story behind Deliver Us From Evil
Subscribe to the Week