Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the giant mortgage providers brought under government control in September 2008, were nationalized at the height of the financial crisis as more and more homeowners defaulted on their loans. Covering both companies' obligations has already cost taxpayers a bundle and financial experts are now warning that they could require "the mother of all bailouts" if house prices fall further. By the numbers:
The period of time between each foreclosure taken over by Fannie and Freddie in the first three months of 2010
The number of houses owned by Fannie and Freddie at the end of March 2010. Seattle has roughly the same number of residential properties.
The amount the nationalization of Fannie and Freddie has so far cost the American taxpayer. That's $83.6 billion from Fannie, and $61.3 billion from Freddie.
The amount the Congressional Budget Office predicts Fannie and Freddie will cost the American taxpayer over the next decade. Other analysts have pegged the "worst case scenario" as $1 trillion.
The amount of money it costs the government to sell a house
The average loss Fannie and Freddie take on each house they resell
The approximate amount the government spent to maintain the condition of its foreclosed houses last year
Average monthly amount the government pays a contractor to mow the lawn of a single foreclosed home. That adds up to a total monthly bill of $10 million.
Number of years homeowners who now "walk away" from a Fannie or Freddie mortgage will have to wait before being eligible for a new loan.
The combined losses of the two firms in 2009
Fannie Mae's share price on June 29. In October 2007, the price reached a high of $66.95. Fannie and Freddie have both been forced to delist from the New York Stock Exchange.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- The U.S. is about to sell weapons to Vietnam. That's bad news for China.
- What the Middle Ages can tell us about the GOP's big charity myth
- Why is the Pentagon stuffing caves in Norway full of tanks?
- The most sensible GOP alternative to ObamaCare comes from a Senate candidate who is almost sure to lose
- 10 things you need to know today: October 23, 2014
- The one thing the New Atheists get right about religion
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- When Khomeini said no to Iranian nukes
- 3 horrific inaccuracies in Homeland's depiction of Islamabad
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
Subscribe to the Week