An independent British investigation into the "Climategate" scandal has cleared the scientists behind the controversial emails, says Bryan Walsh at Time. Muir Russell, a senior British civil servant who lead the inquiry, concluded that the researchers involved "could have been more open" with global warming skeptics, but there was "no evidence of fraud" — which is to say, the scientists didn't manipulate the data showing that the planet really is warming. In a perfect world, that would put the matter to rest. But don't expect the skeptics to "lay down their arms," because this controversy is more about politics than it is about science. Here, an excerpt:
"Our positions [on global warming] seem set, and have as much to do with emotion and ideology as anything else. It's inescapable that nearly all the plans to reduce carbon emissions involve either a new tax or stronger government regulations of the private industry through a carbon cap and efficiency standards — so it's not exactly surprising that Republicans would be more skeptical of climate change, and Democrats more accepting. ...
So what's the answer? Well, at the very least climate scientists need to be more upfront with the public about their methods, data and conclusions... And there's hope that the Climategate affair, for all its tawdriness, might actually push researchers in that direction."
Fighting climate change will be the equivalent of a war, one that will last for decades. But we can't get started until we end the civil war amongst us.
Read the full article at Time.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- Why China thinks it could defeat the U.S. in battle
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- What you need to know before you support the police in Ferguson
- Girls on Film: 5 things that need to happen before Hollywood will ever truly change
- How Ferguson made conservatives lose faith in the police
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- How the West produces jihadi tourists
- What the 'death of the library' means for the future of books
Subscribe to the Week