TV sitcom writers didn't create "cougars" — evolution did, according to an article in the journal Personality and Individual Differences. Women who have passed their peak fertility years really are far more sexual than their younger counterparts. And the article's authors say that's because the experiences of our ancestors programmed them that way. Here's a quick guide:
What did the researchers find?
Women between the ages of 27 and 45 — those between their most fertile years and menopause — have more sex than younger women, and they have more active fantasy lives. They're also more likely to have casual sex, including one-night stands. And the authors of the study — University of Texas psychologist David Buss and graduate students Judith Easton (the lead author), Jaime Confer, and Cari Goetz — say that's because they're following the example of their ancestors.
How might evolution have programmed middle-aged women to want more sex?
Our ancestors lost as many as half of their children to disease, famine, and war, so they were programmed to produce as many children as possible. Men, the theory goes, were wired to seek as many partners as possible; women, Buss, Easton, and their co-authors say, were programmed to have more sex after their teens and 20s, when it became harder to get pregnant.
What are some of the faults with the study?
To test the evolution theory, the article authors surveyed 827 women about their sexual habits. But about 75 percent of the study participants were found via Craigslist, a website where many go seeking casual sexual encounters, so the test subjects might skew towards the promiscuous. And, as the article notes, there may be other reasons women in their 30s and 40s are more sexual. They might simply be more comfortable with sex and their sexuality than younger women. The study also didn't control for "hormonal birth control" like the pill, which can affect libido and is more widely used by younger women.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why Pakistan won't hunt down the terrorists within its borders
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How academia's liberal bias is killing social science
- Sorry, GOP, tax cuts don't pay for themselves
- Pope Francis' American problem
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why torture doesn't work: A definitive guide
- What is Molly? Everything you need to know about the party drug
- 10 things you need to know today: December 19, 2014
Subscribe to the Week