The all-encompassing ubiquity of the internet has its obvious advantages, writes Patrick Kingsley in the Guardian. "Round-the-clock news feeds" and endless pages of hyperlinks mean 21st century human beings are able to assimilate many tidbits of information in a small amount of time. But the internet may be robbing us of our ability to concentrate on a single text for longer than a few minutes at a time. Our "hyperactive online habits" have damaged our ability to "sit back, contemplate" and understand lengthy tracts of information. But there may be a solution on the horizon:
A literary revolution is at hand. First we had slow food, then slow travel. Now, those campaigns are joined by a slow-reading movement – a disparate bunch of academics and intellectuals who want us to take our time while reading, and re-reading. They ask us to switch off our computers every so often and rediscover both the joy of personal engagement with physical texts, and the ability to process them fully...
[It's not] a new idea: as early as 1623, the first edition of Shakespeare's folio encouraged us to read the playwright "again and again"; in 1887, Friedrich Nietzsche described himself as a "teacher of slow reading"; and, back in the 20s and 30s, dons such as IA Richards popularised close textual analysis within academic circles. But what's clear is that our era's technological diarrhoea is bringing more and more slow readers to the fore.
Read the entire article at the Guardian.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Russia is stealthily threatening America with nuclear war
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The science of sex: 4 harsh truths about dating and mating
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- 13 Urban Outfitters controversies
- Do you need to be crazy to be the best?
- What political elites don't understand about Scotland's push for independence
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why gay people of color are still losing
Subscribe to the Week