Nearly seven and a half years after the invasion of Iraq, the last American combat brigade left the country on Thursday, driving over the border into Kuwait. The departure beat President Obama's Aug. 31 deadline for the end of combat operations. The next milestone comes at the end of next year, when the rest of America's troops are scheduled to come home. In the meantime, the State Department, backed by a private army of security guards, is preparing to take over the job of defending U.S. facilities in the country. Does the mean the war is over? (Watch an AP report about U.S. troops leaving Iraq)
Work remains, but the worst is over: The end of combat operations means "the most trying and bloodiest parts of the Iraq War are, we hope, behind us," says Daniel Foster at National Review. But we still have 50,000 American soldiers on the ground, so "our involvement there is hardly" finished.
"Some perspective on the end of 'combat' operations in Iraq"
Americans aren't done fighting, and dying, in Iraq: It's true the "so-called advise and assist brigades" that remain in Iraq don't "have a formal combat mission," says Jim Miklaszewski at MSNBC, but some of them will accompany Iraqi forces hunting al Qaeda fighters, so they "could indeed be drawn into combat." And our soldiers may be needed for years — Iraq's military chief warned last week that Iraqi forces won't be ready to provide security for all of Iraq until 2020.
"U.S. brigades out of Iraq, but not necessarily out of combat"
There's no denying the significance of this "milestone": It's too early to declare "Misson Accomplished," says Steve Benen at Washington Monthly. Iraqi politicians are still "struggling badly to form a government," deadly violence remains common, and nobody knows "what will unfold in the absence of U.S. combat brigades." Still, let's take a moment to appreciate "a milestone that, for a long while, seemed like it would never arrive."
"Operation Iraqi Freedom comes to an end"
Getting the rest out won't be easy: President Obama has promised to bring the rest of our soldiers home by the end of next year, says Ross Colvin at Reuters. Unfortunately, that's "easier said than done": Violence has "dipped sharply" since sectarian warfare peaked four years ago, but "Iraq remains fragile and its leaders have not resolved a number of politically explosive issues that could easily trigger renewed fighting."
"Will Obama keep US troops in Iraq beyond 2011?"
There's not much to celebrate: So, we went to war under false pretenses, with "no plan," says David Dayen at FireDogLake, and lost more than 4,000 men and women. In the bargain, we "sparked a civil war that still simmers." And now "we're trading the US military for DynCorp." What exactly are we supposed to be cheering about?
"Leaving Iraq — Last combat unit crosses the border"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How the South's ugly racial history is haunting ObamaCare
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- If Democrats abandon immigration reform after Tuesday's likely loss, they will turn 2016 into a debacle
- The real story behind Deliver Us From Evil
- What if Leo Strauss was right?
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- Feast your eyes on this beautiful linguistic family tree
- Beware of Splenda: The backlash against artificial sugars
- Stop making fun of philosophy and read some philosophy
Subscribe to the Week