It sounds like something out of a comic book, but scientists say an "anti-universe" may exist — and we could be on the verge of discovering it. Here's an instant guide:
Is there really an anti-universe?
Theoretically, yes. Our universe is almost entirely matter, but cosmologists say that the Big Bang must have produced an equal amount of anti-matter. The problem of where that anti-matter has gone is known as the "baryon assymetry." One theory goes that an entire universe of anti-matter could exist on the edge of our own.
How could we possibly find it?
Using an Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer. One of these futuristic-sounding devices is set to be installed at the International Space Station next year. The 8.5 ton instrument is designed to detect dark matter in our own universe, but it "may also answer questions not yet asked," says Robert Evans at ABC News.
What's the difference between dark matter and anti-matter?
Dark matter exists in our universe — in fact, scientists think it may make up 23 percent of it — but it's incredibly difficult to detect as it does not reflect light. Anti-matter is the opposite of matter, and barely exists in our universe at all. Matter and anti-matter annihilate each other on contact, creating energy.
How easy will the anti-universe be to detect?
Not easy. Both matter and anti-matter will produce light in the same way, so scientists say the only way to detect an anti-matter region is to identify the boundary that keeps it separate from a matter-dominated region. The annihilation reactions within that boundary would produce gamma rays, and it is these that the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer may be able to detect from deep space.
What would the anti-universe contain?
We have no idea. Science fiction writers have long imagined it to be a mirror image of our own universe, with the capacity to produce life — a theory that some scientists actually subscribe to. In any case, so little is known about it that no theory is too far-fetched. NPR's Ron Elving, for example, claims the anti-universe exists in Alaska, though his proof — Tea Partier Joe Miller's primary win over Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) — is unscientific, to say the least.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 10 things you need to know today: October 24, 2014
- Why is the Pentagon stuffing caves in Norway full of tanks?
- What the Middle Ages can tell us about the GOP's big charity myth
- The U.S. is about to sell weapons to Vietnam. That's bad news for China.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Let us now praise Billy Joel
- 3 horrific inaccuracies in Homeland's depiction of Islamabad
- Did the media get Ferguson wrong?
- The most sensible GOP alternative to ObamaCare comes from a Senate candidate who is almost sure to lose
Subscribe to the Week