he French Senate has overwhelmingly approved a bill barring Muslim women from wearing traditional, full-facial veils anywhere in public. Here are some reactions from around the world: (Watch a report about the burqa ban)
This is a victory for Muslim women — Le Monde (France)
Banning the veil is the right thing to do, say the editors. There's a consensus across most of the political spectrum in France that forcing women to cover up amounts to "sexual apartheid." Belgium has already passed a similar ban, and the new law in France only affects about 2,000 women — there's just no good argument against it.
"The Senate must pass the bill banning the full veil"
Surely the courts won't stand for this — Al Arabiya (Dubai)
France's policies these days — including the drive to expel Roma Gypsies — are difficult to defend against charges of racism, say the editors of the Dubai's Al Arabiya News Channel. The ban on face veils has the "rare distinction" of having been "condemned in advance by both the United States and al Qaeda." Faced with that kind of a consensus, it will be hard for French courts to deny this law is "discriminatory" and let it take effect.
"France parliament adopts ban on full-face veil"
Religious tolerance has it's limits — Jerusalem Post (Israel)
Sarkozy argues that "the burka is an attack on the dignity of women," says the editorial board of the Jerusalem Post. "We agree." The practice of "blotting a woman out from head to toe" is not only "misogynistic," it "undermines social cohesion" — and presents a legitimate security threat (who knows who — or what — is being hidden?). Just as religious freedom isn't a valid pretext for walking around naked in public, neither should it protect this "brutal" practice.
"Rejecting the burqa"
Banning the veil isn't about freeing women — The Guardian (United Kingdom)
The "pious rhetoric" about how this will liberate Muslim women is malarkey, says Joan Wallach Scott. And banning Islamic face coverings won't stop terrorists from covering up while they blow up buildings — they can still don motorcycle and fencing helmets, ski masks, and carnival costumes, which are exempt. This is really part of a campaign to "purify and protect national identity" by purging "so-called foreign elements," including anything related to Islam.
"France's ban on the Islamic veil has little to do with female emancipation"
Misguided, but of limited local interest — Jakarta Globe/Indonesia Ulema Council (Indonesia)
We disagree with the French government's action, says Indonesia's top body of Muslim clerics. If the goal is to "champion human rights," it would be much better served by allowing women to wear what they choose. That said, burqas are "not much of an issue" for the 200 million Muslims in Indonesia. "We’re quite far away and Muslim women [here] don’t wear full-face veils."
"Ulema Council opposes French ban"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- 7 ways to be the most interesting person in any room
- Who are the real gay marriage bigots?
- Sorry Belle Knox, porn still oppresses women
- Colorado’s new ‘drive high, get a DUI’ commercials are actually pretty clever
- Why is American internet so slow?
- Watch The Daily Show mock Fox News' confused man-crush on Vladimir Putin
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- Religious liberty should be a liberal value, too
- Why states should stop limiting the alcohol content in your beer
Subscribe to the Week