The Tea Party and Republican "establishment" aren't that far apart ideologically, says Glenn Greenwald in Salon, so what's behind the civil war raging between the two camps? It's a class thing. From inside the Beltway, Walmart shopping Tea Partiers like Delaware's Christine O'Donnell and Nevada's Sharron Angle — even Sarah Palin — are "too harsh and declassé for our effete Guardians of Elite Political Power" to stomach, much less welcome into the "Ruling Class." Here's an excerpt:
The "tea party" movement is, in my view, a mirror image of the Republican Party generally.... It is dominated — in terms of leadership, ideology, and the vast majority of adherents — by the same set of beliefs which have long shaped the American Right.... I see little good in it and much potential for bad. To me, it's little more than the same extremely discredited faction which drove the country into the ground for the last decade, merely re-branded under a new name.
All that said, there are some reactions to the Tea Party movement coming from many different directions — illustrated by the patronizing mockery of Christine O'Donnell — which I find quite misguided, revealingly condescending, and somewhat obnoxious....
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Syrian women know how to defeat ISIS
- Will Kobani be ISIS's Waterloo?
- The one thing the New Atheists get right about religion
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The U.S. Marines are developing laser weapons. Here's why.
- The case for voting (even if America is a corrupt plutocracy rigged by the rich)
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 3 horrific inaccuracies in Homeland's depiction of Islamabad
- Why the Supreme Court is allowing Texas to hold an unconstitutional election
- Gamergate has backfired spectacularly on its nincompoop perpetrators
Subscribe to the Week