"Gen. Jim Jones will go down in history as the least successful national security advisor since Adm. John Poindexter was forced out of office during the Reagan administration," says David J. Rothkopf in Foreign Policy. Though Jones boasted stellar military credentials, we've learned "that military experience is no guarantee of success" in this job. Jones "was not particularly creative or intellectually curious" at a time when Obama needs someone to "bring insight, wisdom, and new ideas" and to advise him, behind closed doors "when they think he should reconsider an approach." It's clear that Obama "picked the wrong man" — and then compounded the error with his own inexperience. Now he has a chance to choose more wisely. Here, an excerpt:
The president's inexperience did in Jones more than any of the general's deficits. He didn't know what he wanted. He vacillated on key issues. He simply demonstrated the problems America repeatedly has when it hires men with no foreign-policy background to take on the most important international job in the world... [The president] did not empower Jones, and that combined with Jones's own shortcomings led to the zero-chemistry, ineffective collaboration that has been openly criticized by senior White House and foreign policy officials since the spring of Obama's first year in office.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- How our botched understanding of 'science' ruins everything
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The science of sex: 4 harsh truths about dating and mating
- 7 tips for keeping your man (from the 1950s)
- 4 simple steaks you can cook in a pan
- Why does Fareed Zakaria still have a job?
- Save the world... by changing how you pee
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- Does solar energy have a battery problem?
Subscribe to the Week