fter years of monotonous rumors and dashed hopes, Apple will apparently release a Verizon-compatible iPhone early next year, offering customers an alternative to its once-exclusive, much-maligned carrier AT&T. But the promise of improved service is already growing dimmer, some say, due to differences in the technology behind Verizon's and AT&T's cellular networks. Here are three ways the Verizon alternative may suffer from comparisons with current iPhones:
1. No multitasking
Apple likes to tout the way the AT&T iPhone lets users talk on the phone while checking email or browsing the internet at the same time. But "unless Verizon has a trick up its sleeve," customers won't be able to multitask on the new iPhone, says Beatweek Magazine, since Verizon's technology, known as CDMA, can't handle calls and data at the same time. The company "is working on providing that capability," Verizon executive Brian Higgins tells The Wall Street Journal, though he says only "fringe" users really consider it important. No way, counters an AT&T spokesperson: "When it comes to the smartphones, it's a big deal."
2. Decreased international capability
Verizon's technology "is widely used in the U.S., but less so elsewhere in the world," reports the WSJ, "so Verizon iPhone customers wouldn't be able to use their phones in many parts of Europe and Asia." Despite other complaints about its system, AT&T phones tend to have greater success overseas.
3. Shorter battery life
Another downside of CDMA is that it eats up battery life more quickly than AT&T's system, so Verizon iPhone users may be dealing more often with a dead phone at the end of the night. One upside: Until multitasking is an option on Verizon phones, the odds of maxing out their power supply may be lower.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why China's Communist Party is headed for collapse
- How to make perfect fried rice in 6 easy steps
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- Obama doesn't have a manhood problem — but conservatives certainly do
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why Antonin Scalia was right to defend a drug dealer
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why we need a maximum wage
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- The sexual politics of Game of Thrones just got enormously worse
Subscribe to the Week