ay LaHood has a new bugbear, says Holman W. Jenkins, Jr. in The Wall Street Journal. The transportation secretary has declared war on "distracted driving," or the use of cellphones behind the wheel. LaHood would have us believe that the advent of the smartphone has resulted in a bloodbath on our nation's roads, but he is "spreading darkness as much as light." The highway fatality rate has actually been steadily dropping for five years, even as smartphones get more popular. Now, LaHood is threatening to enact an "outright ban" on using a smartphone while driving. But drivers are just as likely to be distracted by their breakfast, says Jenkins. Here, an excerpt:
No less a harridan for safety than the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has dubbed [LaHood's] campaign misguided. The group's own studies show that the numerous laws enacted around the country to ban or restrict cellphone use have produced no impact on accident rates. Even where phone use has measurably declined, crashes haven't...
By definition, smart phones are implicated in more accidents today than they were before smart phones were invented. But it appears that drivers simply substitute one distraction for another, yakking on the phone instead of spilling coffee in their laps, gobbling down hot dogs or trying to control kids in the backseat.... The truth is, an electronic device is not more villainous than a bagel.
Read the entire article at The Wall Street Journal.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why would a young person today be religious?
- The world's dumbest idea: Taxing solar energy
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why we can't stop procrastinating, according to science
- Why Holy Thursday is so important to Christians
- Israel and Russia are getting along. Have the neocons noticed?
- How Community's Dean Pelton broke new ground for sexual politics on television
- Why I'm a pro-life liberal
- Texas has been holding this man hostage for 12,600 days
Subscribe to the Week