ince November's "shellacking" at the polls, The White House has been engaged in a "full-scale reboot of the Obama presidency," says John Heilemann at New York. Gone is the "frenetic, transactional, shambolic style" of former chief of staff Rahm Emanuel. In will come a "less cloistered and more strategic" commander-in-chief, with a revamped team of aides ready to establish "a compelling narrative" for where the president hopes to take the country. Tuesday night's State of the Union address, writes Heilemann, will give Obama a chance to soar above the "posturing, petulance and incessant bile-spewing" of Washington, and grasp both a higher tone, and the mettle of his presidency. Here, an excerpt:
...substantial changes are afoot in every realm [of Obama's White House] from management structure and political strategy to communications, policy, and even the president’s conception of his own role—as he and his people try to navigate the newly Republicanized legislative landscape and gear up for what they now fretfully assume (after months of airily believing otherwise) will be a difficult reelection campaign.
For Obama, retooling on this scale does not come naturally or happily. Among the hallmarks of his political career has been constancy: a tight and basically static cadre of close advisers and a stubborn resistance to calls for midcourse corrections. Yet in a series of interviews in early January with senior White House officials and many of Obama’s closest confidants outside the building, a picture emerged of a president engaged in a searching, clear-eyed, and sometimes painful process of self-scrutiny, and now determined to implement a plan to fix what has ailed his enterprise—and himself.
Read the entire article at New York.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why China's Communist Party is headed for collapse
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why Texas Republicans may want to cool the anti-Obama land-grab talk
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- How to make perfect fried rice in 6 easy steps
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why we need a maximum wage
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- Obama doesn't have a manhood problem — but conservatives certainly do
Subscribe to the Week