After years of being blamed for errors in the Iraq War, Donald Rumsfeld will tell his own side of the story in his soon-to-be published memoir. Critics who've reviewed Known and Unknown, the 800-page tome due in bookstores next week, say "Rummy" remains "largely unapologetic." Rumsfeld strikes a "characteristically tough and defiant" tone in the autobiography, says Bradley Graham at The Washington Post, and remains "unrepentant" about the overall handling of the war. Here, five key revelations:
Planning for Iraq began in November 2001
Bush asked Rumsfeld "where do we stand on the Iraq planning" on November 21, 2001, just two months after the attacks of September 11 — before U.S. troops even invaded Afghanistan. "It's the latest confirmation," says Howard Kurtz in The Daily Beast, "that war — or at least serious war planning — was gearing up long before the public was clued in and despite the absence of any link between Saddam and the terrorist attacks."
Rumsfeld has no regrets on Iraq...
The Middle East would be "far more perilous than it is today" if Saddam Hussein were still in power, writes Rumsfeld. While he concedes that "there may have been times when more troops could have helped" in the disastrous follow-up to the invasion, he claims no U.S. commander asked him for more soldiers.
... but wishes he had quit after Abu Ghraib
While Rumsfeld defends the controversial interrogation techniques used by the Army during the war, he regrets not quitting after the Abu Ghraib detainee abuse scandal. Abu Ghraib became a "damaging distraction," he writes, fueled by "partisan critics of the war and the president." He wrote Bush two letters of resignation, but neither was accepted. Regret is one thing, says Pratap Chatterjee at The Guardian, but the citizens of the U.S. and Iraq are still waiting for Rumsfeld to "apologize for the crimes of that war." That no apology is imminent is "rich, but not surprising."
He settles scores with his Republican enemies...
Rumsfeld "devotes a lot of space to rewaging various long-forgotten bureaucratic disputes," says Alex Pareene at Salon. These include setting the record straight on fallings-out with Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, George H.W. Bush, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, and Sen. John McCain, whom he says has a "propensity to shift his positions to appeal to the media." McCain, for one, has struck back: "Thank God he was relieved of his duties," the Arizona senator told ABC News. "Otherwise, we would have had a disastrous defeat in Iraq."
... and even criticizes George W. Bush
Though Rumsfeld is careful to call Bush a "formidable president," he is critical of 43's leadership — particularly, his inability to resolve feuds between the Pentagon and the State Department. Bush allowed Paul Bremer, U.S. Administrator to Iraq, to steer the post-invasion recovery, says Rumsfeld, and should have given less credence to the State Department in general. "There were far too many hands on the steering wheel," he writes. That "was a formula for running the truck into a ditch."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- How academia's liberal bias is killing social science
- Hey, bosses: Stop giving bonuses to your employees
- Why the Sony hack changes everything
- You should be furious about Hollywood's gutless retreat on The Interview
- Why torture doesn't work: A definitive guide
- Capitalism isn't a cure-all for Cuba
- Vox, derp, and the intellectual stagnation of the left
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- One girl's extraordinarily wild world
Subscribe to the Week