ollege students are using prescription stimulants like Adderall and Ritalin in such soaring numbers, says Matt Lamkin in The Chronicle of Higher Education, that one school's student journalists found they could score Adderall in their library in less than one minute. Students are taking the drugs, normally prescribed to treat attention-deficit disorders, as cognition-enhancing study aids, a route some consider cheating — "akin to the use of steroids in sports" — and many schools want to eliminate the practice. But that doesn't make sense, Lamkin says. If the drugs really do help academic performance, "shouldn't colleges put them in the drinking water instead?" Here, an excerpt:
If our key concern is fairness, making study drugs available to all students could actually do more to promote that goal than banning them. Of course, to the extent that such drugs pose health risks, it's prudent to restrict their use. But that seems like an argument about safety, not fairness. While safety is a valid concern, it is one that might be overcome by better drug design. If we are still troubled by the idea of a study drug that is safe and universally available, we have to look for other sources of our discomfort.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why I'm a pro-life liberal
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- If a nuclear bomb exploded in downtown Washington, what should you do?
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- How Ukraine can fend off the Russians, in 7 simple steps
- These stunning travel photos remind us that we're all just amateurs with iPhones
- Why we can't stop procrastinating, according to science
- How to be more satisfied with your life, according to science
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- There's a number of reasons the grammar of this headline could infuriate you
Subscribe to the Week