Armaggedon, Deep Impact, and a host of other space-rock-hurtling-toward-earth blockbusters all follow the same unrealistic formula, writes Discovery Channel's Phil Plait at Blastr. These movies invariably begin when "an amateur astronomer spots something in the sky that shouldn't be there." What follows is typically "a hurried email, a chat over the 'net, and then confirmation from professional observatories — but a discovery kept secret from the public." Then, NASA quickly trains and dispatches a crack team (led by an action star like Bruce Willis) to fly into outer space and blow up the asteroid just before it wipes out civilization. In real life, though, robotic networks would be the likely candidates to spot a dangerous asteroid. And astronomers would be terrible at keeping a secret. Oh, and NASA, a famously slow-moving outfit, would need years to mount such a dangerous and complex operation. Even then, detonating a nuclear bomb on top of an asteroid isn't quite the solution that Hollywood claims. Here, an excerpt:
This is where the movies really part from reality. First of all, anything hundreds of miles across — or even just a few — won't get shattered to smithereens by a nuke. You might carve a chunk out of it, but it would be like tossing a firecracker at a boulder. In Armageddon, given the size of the asteroid involved, they'd need a nuke that could detonate with the same energy output as the sun.
I'm rather glad we don't have a weapon like that.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Beware of Splenda: The backlash against artificial sugars
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Stop making fun of philosophy and read some philosophy
- The real story behind Deliver Us From Evil
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- How to live a long life, according to science
- Sorry, we will not all be having sex with robots in the future
- 13 Urban Outfitters controversies
Subscribe to the Week