In our political culture, tax increases have become "unthinkable," says David Leonhardt in The New York Times, "even to pay for benefits people want." Yet we're facing gigantic — and growing — budget deficits that will remain "frighteningly large" over the next decade unless we slash spending and raise taxes. President Obama is pushing tax reform to make the affluent pay more, but "while those increases will certainly help, they're not enough." The Republican solution is "even fuzzier," with calls for cutting taxes for the wealthy, and eliminating mysterious, unidentified tax breaks at the same time. So what's the solution? Our "best hope for deficit reduction" may be for Congress to do nothing at all, and simply let all the Bush tax cuts expire on Dec. 31, 2012. Here, an excerpt:
If Mr. Obama wins re-election, he could simply refuse to sign any budget-busting tax cut for the rich — who, after all, have received much larger pretax raises than any other income group in recent years and have also had their tax rates fall more. Republicans, for their part, could again refuse to pass any partial extension. And just like that, on Jan. 1, 2013, the Clinton-era tax rates would return. This change, by itself, would solve about 75 percent of the deficit problem over the next five years.
Read the entire piece in The New York Times.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why the West should let Russia have eastern Ukraine
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- The real reason conservatives should be outraged that police killed a white youth
- The dangers of our passionless American life
- Girls on Film: Belle is one of the most groundbreaking, joyous movies of the summer
- The amazing resurrection of Mitt Romney
- 10 things you need to know today: August 30, 2014
- Barack Obama's futile attempt to be a modern-day George Washington
Subscribe to the Week