Opponents and supporters of abortion rights don't agree on much, but both seem to concede that Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court ruling that says a woman's right to privacy extends to her decision to have an abortion, is effectively "no longer the law of the land," writes Dahlia Lithwick at Slate. Increasingly more and more states are enacting "invasive, paternalistic, and degrading" abortion regulations which clearly violate Roe, yet they become law because they go unchallenged. Why? Because a legal challenge to these state laws allows for the possibility that the case will eventually go to the Supreme Court, where Roe v. Wade could be overturned completely. This prospect has "frightened those who are pro-abortion rights into being grateful for what they have," even if it's obsolete at a state level. Here, an excerpt:
Gone are the days in which legislatures at least attempted to ensure state regulations conformed to the broadest interpretation of the Roe constraints. The new game lies in expressly violating Roe... at the state level, in the hopes of either forcing the issue at the Supreme Court or making abortion unobtainable as a matter of fact. Either way, abortion opponents believe they will win — and here pro-abortion rights groups may actually agree...
The risk of challenging these clearly unconstitutional laws and then losing at the Supreme Court is evidently so high, according to Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization for Women, that it's not worth taking. As she explained last week to Rachel Maddow, the fear that Justice Samuel Alito would vote to overturn Roe is so deep that reproductive rights groups may be opting to leave the state bans in place. And, as she conceded in that interview, wherever unconstitutional state abortion bans go unchallenged, they become law.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- What is driving the increasingly weird behavior of the polar jet stream?
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How our botched understanding of 'science' ruins everything
- Christians have no moral rationale for spanking their children
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- Should you hope to die at 75? Absolutely not.
- The science of sex: 4 harsh truths about dating and mating
- Why America should team up with Bashar al-Assad's regime
- Stop hating on cyclists
Subscribe to the Week