"By any sensible standard," Paul Simon is "a great American composer," says Jim Fusilli at The Wall Street Journal. And yet, while peers like Bob Dylan and Joni Mitchell are worshipped and emulated by today's up-and-coming artists, "young musicians and fans haven't embraced the 69-year-old Mr. Simon with the same gusto." Why? In part, it's because Simon isn't hip, and really never has been. But that's a pretty lame rationale for dismissing his impressive and enduring catalog of hits, which "land squarely on the heart as well as the mind." Here, an excerpt:
There may be legitimate reasons for the chasm between Mr. Simon and younger audiences. Some of his lyrics portray him as an upscale urban intellectual who shields his emotions behind a well-considered phrase; when he writes at street level, there can be a sense that he's revealing research rather than experience. Mr. Simon's lyrics are almost always age appropriate; that is, his point of view is often that of whatever age he was when he wrote the song, relating experiences younger musicians and fans may not have had. For all his musical explorations— gospel, reggae, Mexican folk, South African mbaqanga, Afro-Brazilian batucada and electronic soundscapes, among them— Mr. Simon's recordings often polish away needed bite and edge. He's not an indie rocker.
Read the entire article at The Wall Street Journal.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- 7 of the scariest spiders in existence
- 4 things NASA can teach you about a good night's sleep
- Why isn't 'Arkansas' pronounced like 'Kansas'?
- Welcome to the age of ambivalent feminism
- It's time for the police to rethink 'shoot-to-kill'
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- How Israel's hawks intimidated and silenced the last remnants of the anti-war left
- Is the Christian music industry liberalizing on gay marriage?
- Internet piracy isn't killing Hollywood
Subscribe to the Week