new study found that from 1985 to 2001, members of the House of Representatives made 6.8 percent more on their stock purchases and sales than the average investor. An earlier investigation by the same researchers found that senators also beat the market. The latest report, which was published in the journal Business and Politics, concludes that members of Congress were almost certainly relying on insider information to fatten their stock portfolios. Are lawmakers engaged in shady trading, or are they just unusually savvy investors?
This is corruption, pure and simple: There is no denying it now, says Vox Populi. "Congress is shamelessly crooked." And the most disgusting part of this is that it's perfectly legal, because members of Congress have exempted themselves from laws that send corporate executives to prison for doing the same thing — trading on insider knowledge for personal gain.
"Corrupt like a senator"
Wait, there is no direct proof of anything shady: The researchers have no specific evidence to back up their conclusions, says Seth Fiegerman at Minyanville. They're just assuming politicians are picking stocks based on inside information about the industries and companies they oversee. But maybe they really are just good investors. "If nothing else, next time you write a letter to your congressman, you may want to ask him for stock advice."
"Your congressman: A better investor than you?"
Still, congressmen should be regulated like bankers: Beating the market by 6.8 percent over so many years is "better than hedge-fund superstars" can do, says Randall W. Forsyth at Barron's. It defies credulity to suggest that everyone on Capitol Hill is that good. But don't worry, there is an "estimably logical" solution. Let "the same reporting requirements imposed on corporate insiders be placed on members of Congress. After all, being on Capitol Hill makes one an ultimate insider."
"Fire your hedge fund manager, hire your congressman"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why we need a maximum wage
- Why Antonin Scalia was right to defend a drug dealer
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- The sexual politics of Game of Thrones just got enormously worse
- Why Narendra Modi is not a shoo-in to become India's next prime minister
- Why Mindy Kaling — not Lena Dunham — is the body positive icon of the moment
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- 9 ways music can improve your life
Subscribe to the Week