s news organizations finish scrutinizing 24,199 printed pages of Sarah Palin's emails covering the period from her December 2006 debut as Alaska's governor to her September 2008 national debut as Sen. John McCain's running mate, one thing's clear: No bombshells. But the emails do soften the frozen image people have of Palin, says The New York Times, by adding "nuance and depth." Or, as The Washington Post puts it, "vivid new color and fresh details." Is that all? Here, four lessons from the Palin emails:
1. They remind us why Palin was so popular pre-McCain
More than anything, this trove of correspondence reminds us that "once, there was a different Sarah Palin," a "popular, charismatic, competent woman of the people," says Molly Ball at Politico. The picture isn't "all rosy," but it's easy to see why the "touchingly authentic," pragmatic Palin had an 80 percent gubernatorial approval rating before she joined the McCain ticket. Then "her darker tendencies — defensiveness, thin skin, grudge-keeping — hardened into tics."
2. They reveal just how poorly Palin dealt with scrutiny
The emails also show that Palin became increasingly invested in curating her self-image during her stint as governor, say Sean Cockerham and Erika Bolstad in the Anchorage Daily News. In her early emails, she seems serious about being "open and transparent," and even showed a "desire to engage" with the press. But as the questions from reporters got tougher, she became more and more "engrossed with countering her critics," be they reporters, or even anonymous blog commenters.
3. The emails mostly confirm what we already knew
The emails will no doubt be invaluable to "future biographers of Sarah Palin and historians of the Aughts," says David Weigel at Slate. For the rest of us, they merely reinforce the picture of Palin that years of relentless reporting have painted. Are the few mockable "nuggets" worth all this expense and fuss, asks Patricia Williams in The Guardian. Not really: We didn't need 24,000 emails to confirm that she's "banal, hypocritical, and smug," or that she looks like a "paragon of virtue" next to sexting Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.).
4. The whole affair proves Palin is right about the "lamestream media"
The emails aren't totally useless, since they prove that the press really does view Palin with "extreme hostility," says Thomas Lifson at the American Thinker. She is, after all, a "private citizen, and a candidate for no office," so the reporters who "minutely" combed her emails for gotchas did nothing but expose their liberal "political agenda." Life really is too short for such pointless obsessiveness, agrees Robert Stein at Connecting the Dots. But as far as the media's supposed political bias goes, note the press's constant, equally despicable hammering of the liberal Weiner. "Wake me when it's over."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like
- What the collapse of the Ming Dynasty can tell us about American decline
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- 7 ways to be the most interesting person in any room
- Here's proof that Justin Bieber is just as spoiled as you always thought
- Why is American internet so slow?
- What would a U.S.-China war look like?
- Why is it so expensive to build a bridge in America?
- 22 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The obstacles to religious enchantment in a secular age
Subscribe to the Week