Libya's rebels have raised their flag in Moammar Gadhafi's Tripoli compound, symbolically declaring victory over their longtime ruler. Though not all of the country is under rebel control and even though Gadhafi has eluded capture and vows to keep fighting, the National Transitional Council (NTC) said on Wednesday that it's moving key ministries from Benghazi to Tripoli. However, as we all learned from Iraq, says Fred Kaplan at Slate, "'regime change' marks only the beginning of the story, not the end." Here, four potential hazards the NTC must avoid to keep Libya from descending into chaos:
1. Looting and lawlessness
Libya's new government must "impose law and order immediately," says Kaplan, even if that requires a curfew, or a short period of martial law. "If the U.S.-led authorities had shot a few looters in the first days after Saddam Hussein fled Baghdad," Iraq would have been spared a lot of grief. In Libya, "the sheer amount of weaponry strewn around the country will probably pose the greatest challenge," says Christopher Hill at CNN. In the short term, the rebel factions have to be disbanded, and either sent home or integrated into the quickly retrained police force.
2. A rash dismantling of Gadhafi's regime
Gadhafi was eccentric, but he designed his government along fairly "normal" lines, says Brian Whitaker in Britain's Guardian. The worst thing the NTC can do is "dismantle it at a stroke and then start again from scratch." The NTC needs to find a "very delicate tradeoff," says Joshua Tucker at The New Republic, between punishing Gadhafi enablers to meet Libyans' legitimate demands for justice and "incorporating at least some members of the 'Old Regime'" who both know how to run Libya and have an incentive to support the new regime.
3. Demoralizing water, power, and food shortages
"Restoring public order will be job one," says Daniel Serwer at The Atlantic, but close behind is "restoring electricity, food, and water." Basic services are crucial to creating "a functioning government," says Richard Haass in Britain's Financial Times. Libya is lucky that it has oil wealth to pay for that, says The New York Times in an editorial, but "decision-making — including how to restart damaged oil wells and share oil revenues — must be transparent."
4. A new war between rebel factions
The so-called "Libyan rebels" are not a single entity. Factions within the diverse anti-Gadhafi forces share just two common traits, says STRATFOR analyst Bayless Parsley, quoted by CBC News: "One, they're referred to collectively as Libyan rebels, and two, they all shared a common desire to oust Gadhafi." If they don't find a mutually satisfactory way to share power, civil war is "a very real possibility." Especially since some of the factions and tribes "hate one another," says Slate's Kaplan. If they haven't "already settled on some formula" to get along, things "may get very messy."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Watch out, China — America is working on dogfighting drones
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How liberals are unwittingly paving the way for the legalization of adult incest
- Why the Chinese military is only a paper dragon
- How our botched understanding of 'science' ruins everything
- How the Simpsons/Family Guy crossover revealed the worst of both shows
- The troubling persistence of eugenicist thought in modern America
- Why America won't have enough money to battle ISIS
- Bill O'Reilly and Stephen Colbert are accidentally having a serious debate on ISIS
Subscribe to the Week