nergy Secretary Steven Chu, among others, has urged Americans to paint their roofs white to reflect sunlight skyward, on the theory that this will help cool off cities and fight climate change. But Stanford University researchers have tried to quantify, for the first time, how much cities, or "heat islands," actually contribute to global warming, and they've concluded that the well-intentioned practice of whitewashing the tops of buildings might do more harm than good. Here's what they found:
How much do "heat islands" contribute to climate change?
Not much, according to this new study. Global warming skeptics say cities "are a larger contributor to global warming than the greenhouse gases produced by human activity," says Science Daily, so there's no need to take drastic steps to reduce greenhouse gases. But the Stanford researchers, led by civil and environmental engineering professor Mark Z. Jacobson, concluded that only 2 to 4 percent of the "gross global warming problem" is due to heat emitted from concrete urban heat islands. Seventy-nine percent comes from greenhouse gases, and 18 percent comes from sunlight-absorbing black carbon emissions.
But why are white roofs detrimental?
Using a computerized climate model, the researchers found that white roofs do cause cities to have lower surface temperatures, as they reflect sunlight back into the atmosphere. That's no shock "to anyone who's sat in a car with a black interior in the sun," says Douglas Main at Discover. The trouble is, when there's less heat at street level, less water evaporates to form clouds, which act as buffers against incoming sunlight. And that's not all: When sunlight is reflected from a white rooftop, air pollutants prevalent in cities absorb some of the heat and carry it to other areas, further limiting the cooling effect.
Then what can we do to reduce global warming?
While Jacobson says that white roofs may be a bad idea globally, installing photovoltaic solar panels to shield your home may help make a difference by absorbing sunlight, rather than reflecting it back into the air to be absorbed by pollution. Plus, the panels create clean-running electricity, further reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why China's Communist Party is headed for collapse
- Why Texas Republicans may want to cool the anti-Obama land-grab talk
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How to make perfect fried rice in 6 easy steps
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- Obama doesn't have a manhood problem — but conservatives certainly do
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why we need a maximum wage
Subscribe to the Week