ublicly, Mitt Romney's campaign is unconcerned about Newt Gingrich's surge in the polls, calling it merely the latest anti-Mitt bubble. But behind the scenes, "they know the latest alarm isn't a drill," says Reid J. Epstein at Politico. To try and knock Gingrich out, Team Romney is preparing "a robust, sustained attack that tags the former House speaker as a Washington insider and serial flip-flopper." Newt has indeed changed many of his positions, famously on climate change, an individual mandate to buy health insurance, and the war in Libya. But considering that Romney is also famous for his own flip-flops (on abortion, auto bailouts, and health care, among others), is this really a smart strategy?
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! If Romney actually follows through with this plan, "it will be hilarious," says Jed Lewison at Daily Kos. Sure, Gingrich is "every bit as flip-floppy" as Romney, but using that flaw to attack him has "such an obvious response" — look in the mirror — that Romney must be getting desperate.
"Romney planning to attack Newt Gingrich as a flip-flopping..."
Still, this attack could be effective: The only Romney attack we've seen so far — calling Gingrich a career politician — is "lame," says Carter Eskew at The Washington Post. But Newt's long history of flip-flops is a big reason he "presents what consultants call a 'target-rich' opportunity." If Romney can find the right way to attack that weakness, it will "do double-duty: Hurt Newt and help Mitt by making him look tougher."
"Why Mitt Romney should attack Newt Gingrich"
Newt is vulnerable, but not on flip-flopping: It doesn't really matter that Gingrich's history of flip-flops is "even more extensive than Romney's," says Charles Krauthammer at The Washington Post. Thanks to Newt's "historic conservative triumph" — the GOP's 1994 capture of the House — Republicans see Gingrich's flip-flops as mere "deviations from his conservative core." Romney's, on the other hand, are viewed as proof of his inherent lack of principles.
"Mitt vs. Newt"
Romney and Gingrich are both playing with fire: Romney's "reputation as an inconsistent conservative — a flip-flopper" — is his "most vulnerable spot," and Newt's already poking it, says Doyle McManus in the Los Angeles Times. But Romney would probably be better off responding by attacking Gingrich's mercurial temperament. Regardless, both rivals should tread carefully. The winner of "a bitter battle... over their respective consistency, reliability, and honesty" would probably be President Obama.
"Slugging it out with Gingrich"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why Antonin Scalia was right to defend a drug dealer
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why we need a maximum wage
- 10 things you need to know today: April 23, 2014
- Why Mindy Kaling — not Lena Dunham — is the body positive icon of the moment
- Obama doesn't have a manhood problem — but conservatives certainly do
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- The sexual politics of Game of Thrones just got enormously worse
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
Subscribe to the Week