ewt Gingrich is a former House speaker who is running for president, so perhaps it's no surprise that his least favorite branch of government appears to be the judiciary. Over the weekend, Gingrich told reporters that as president, he'd have the power to eliminate entire federal courts, replace "activist judges," and even ignore certain Supreme Court rulings. He also said Congress should subpoena federal judges whose decisions are "strikingly at variance with America," and that the president could send U.S. Marshals to force unwilling judges to testify. This assault on the independence of the judiciary was roundly criticized, even by conservatives who broadly agree with Gingrich that federal courts are overreaching. What is Gingrich thinking?
Newt is either pandering, or he's nuts: The closer Newt gets to the nomination, "the more unhinged" his attacks on the judiciary seem to become, says Andrew Cohen at The Atlantic. The GOP base hates liberal judges, so maybe Newt is "committing constitutional heresy just to win a few primary votes." But if not, we must assume that he actually buys this crackpot "Rock-Paper-Scissors version" of the Constitution, in which the president and Congress can overrule the Supreme Court. That's frightening.
"Newt Gingrich and his 'Rock, Paper, Scissors' Constitution"
He's going after the separation of church and state: If you look closely, says Kevin Drum at Mother Jones, Newt is only advocating toothless courts when it comes to religion in the public square. "It's really nativity scenes and prayer in public shool that animate him on this subject." That's the motivation behind Newt's comments. He wants America to be a state-supported Christian nation "without any pesky courts getting in the way."
"Newt Gingrich and God"
There's at least a nugget of truth in Newt's rant: People are "dumping on Gingrich, for mostly good reason," says Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit. But he's right that we could use a "constitutional reset" after "the hash the Supreme Court has made of things over the past 50 years." That's what Newt is good at: "Tossing a stink bomb... and letting the ensuing reaction demonstrate that there's something rotten about the status quo." But as with fellow former academic President Obama, some musings are best left to professors.
"Gingrich on judicial review"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why China's Communist Party is headed for collapse
- Why Texas Republicans may want to cool the anti-Obama land-grab talk
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why the poor's investment of choice is so alarming
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How to make perfect fried rice in 6 easy steps
- Obama doesn't have a manhood problem — but conservatives certainly do
- Why Antonin Scalia was right to defend a drug dealer
- Why we need a maximum wage
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
Subscribe to the Week