With a week to go to the Iowa caucuses, all bets are off. In a new statement targeting Mitt Romney, GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has backed off earlier promises to launch a campaign free of negative attacks. In the statement, Gingrich's camp mocks the former Massachusetts governor for calling himself a "conservative businessman," citing a 2002 Romney quote in which he characterizes his views as "progressive." Team Gingrich asserts that its portrayal of Romney as a "Massachusetts moderate" isn't a slight, but rather an "accurate description of who he is." Considering Newt's recent series of setbacks, is throwing down the gauntlet this late in the game a wise move?
Newt needs something new: Gingrich has certainly "thrown elbows at Romney in the past," says Jonathan Martin at Politico, but those were "spur-of-the moment" and straight from the candidate's mouth; this, on the other hand, is a "planned assault." The Gingrich camp is "urgently in need" of momentum and this new offensive campaign "indicates a more significant step toward something that mixes issues and political character" — certainly a "different thing" for Gingrich and his team.
"A first: Newt camp goes on attack (and with oppo)"
You call this an attack? Please: "I put 'attack' in square-quotes because the memo barely qualifies as such," says Tommy Christopher at Mediaite. "It's simply a cobbling together of various Mitt Romney quotes that portray him as a moderate who's willing to compromise." While the Gingrich camp's use of Romney's 2002 "progressive" quote is "obviously designed to hurt Romney with Republican base voters," it's unlikely that the attacks will "move the needle in any meaningful way." After all, Romney's greatest strength is his "electability" among independent voters. Painting him as a moderate will only reinforce that.
"Newt Gingrich ‘attack’ memo reinforces the case for Mitt Romney"
Newt has nothing to lose: While Newt did promise a "stronger counter-punch" to Romney's direct attacks, he's apparently decided "to throw roundhouses unprompted," says Allahpundit at Hot Air. And though focusing on Romney instead of Ron Paul might seem counter-intuitive given Paul's polling strength in Iowa, it effectively turns next Tuesday's caucus into a "Paul vs. Stop Paul" battle. If Newt can do enough damage to Mitt he might be able to snag the undecided vote as the more viable "Stop Paul" option. And if Mitt is wounded badly enough heading into New Hampshire, he'll take a "ferocious beating in the media for underperforming." If Iowa is a "jump ball" anyway, the question surrounding Newt's new offensive is: "Why not?"
"Oh my: Gingrich finally set to go negative on Romney?"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to
- The real reason conservatives should be outraged that police killed a white youth
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- 10 things you need to know today: August 28, 2014
- Why the West should accept ISIS as a sovereign nation
- What Ann Coulter and atheist Richard Dawkins have in common
- After Ferguson, we don't need another dialogue on race
- 8 ways you're probably overspending without even realizing it
Subscribe to the Week