hen the Obama administration unveiled its plan last week to cut roughly half a trillion dollars from future Pentagon budgets, many analysts seized on Obama's call for more unmanned military drones and fewer ground forces. Some critics are skeptical that a "leaner," technology-reliant military can really keep the country safe. But Obama's latest move is part of a much larger trend: As computerized warplanes become safer, more advanced, and cheaper to produce, the military relies on them more and more. Here, a look at America's growing fleet of robotic aircraft, by the numbers:
Approximate fraction in 2005 of military aircraft that were unmanned drones
Approximate fraction today of military aircraft that are unmanned drones
Unmanned drones the military now has in its fighting force
The military's supply of "iconic" Predator and Reaper drones — made famous for their missions over Pakistan and Yemen
Cost of producing a Predator drone
Cost of producing a fully-manned, twin-engine F/A-18 Hornet fighter jet
Cost of producing a fully-manned, stealth B-2 bomber
Predators and Reapers that have crashed in Iraq and Afghanistan
Accidents that Predators had per 100,000 hours of flight in 2005
Accidents that Predators have per 100,000 hours of flight now — "an accident rate comparable to (manned) F-16," says Wired
Total amount the military has spent on drones since 2001
Percent of the Pentagon's aircraft budget that still goes to traditionally piloted planes
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why atheism doesn't have the upper hand over religion
- The world's dumbest idea: Taxing solar energy
- Why would a young person today be religious?
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Which states get screwed worst by the Electoral College?
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- Why Good Friday is so important to Christians
- Why I'm a pro-life liberal
- Why we can't stop procrastinating, according to science
Subscribe to the Week