ensions are rising over Iran's uranium enrichment program, which the U.S. and Europe insist is part of a surreptitious bid to build nuclear weapons. Iran's Islamist leaders, who maintain that they're only interested in nuclear energy, refuse to back down. In response to a potentially devastating new European ban on importing Iranian oil, Tehran is escalating its rhetoric, renewing threats to disrupt all tanker traffic out of the Persian Gulf. Is it time for the West to accept Iran's nuclear program?
Yes. Let Iran enrich all the uranium it wants: "The West is all but isolated in insisting that Iran must not enrich," says Peter Jenkins at Britain's Telegraph. Most other nations think Iran should be treated like every other Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty nation, and be "allowed to enrich uranium in return for intrusive monitoring" by International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors. Iran won't seem as threatening with tough safeguards in place to make sure it's not building a bomb. And if we allow Iran to enrich uranium, and Tehran pursues nukes anyway, "the world will be united in condemning such a betrayal of trust."
"The deal the West could strike with Iran"
Are you kidding? Waiting is foolhardy: There may be no smoking-gun proof that Iran is trying to put together a nuclear weapon, say David Albright, Paul Brannan, Andrea Stricker and Andrew Ortendahl at the Institute for Science and International Security. But "it has pursued a strategy of nuclear hedging" and is building centrifuges under "great secrecy." Why should we trust Iran? Every day we let Iran's nuclear program continue unchecked only shortens the time it would take the country to build a bomb once it decides to do it.
"Reality check: Shorter and shorter timeframe if Iran decides to make nuclear weapons"
Iran's uranium isn't the real issue: There's "nothing illegal" about Iran's stockpiling of low-enriched uranium, says nuclear physicist Yousaf Butt at Foreign Policy. Brazil, Argentina, and Japan — none of which have nuclear weapons — all have plenty of uranium-producing capabilities. Let's be honest: Judging from the "impossible conditions" Western sanctions impose, it's pretty clear the the U.S. and Europe aren't after Iran's nuclear program — they're out to "dismantle the current regime" entirely.
"Stop the madness"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why I'm a pro-life liberal
- If a nuclear bomb exploded in downtown Washington, what should you do?
- 10 things you need to know today: April 16, 2014
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Can these 4 couples really afford their dream houses?
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- How to be more satisfied with your life, according to science
- There's a number of reasons the grammar of this headline could infuriate you
- The contentious policy at the heart of Cliven Bundy's armed standoff with the government
Subscribe to the Week