Is Daniel Radcliffe more than just a one-trick wizard? That's the question critics are asking as The Woman in Black — the actor's first major film after 10 years of playing Harry Potter — opens this weekend. In Black, the 22-year-old plays Arthur Kipps, a circa 1900 London lawyer whose wife recently died in childbirth, leaving him to raise their four-year-old son. The grief-deranged Kipps is about to be sacked when he's given one last shot to save his job: Settle the affairs of a widow who recently died at her old country estate. And, yes, the estate is thoroughly haunted. (Watch the spooky trailer below.) Given that Radcliffe is untested as a star outside the Potter franchise, critics are scrutinizing his believability in this role. Can The Woman in Black prove that, for Radcliffe, there's "life after Harry Potter?"
Yes. He's brilliant: The role of the Black's grieving widower is complicated, but Radcliffe knocks it out of the park, says Stephanie Zacharek at Movieline. The Harry Potter star turns out to be a "deeply sympathetic actor," roaming through the movie "as if he were floating on a cloud composed of equal parts grief and curiosity." In this nuanced and subdued performance, he "holds his emotions close, like a pocketwatch, and yet they still register." If this is what Radcliffe has to offer, he's poised to develop into a "fine young actor."
"Review: The Woman in Black is a bleak Victorian ghost story, offered with a wink"
Which should help this terrific film hit big: The casting of "Harry Potter" already ensured this film a large audience, says Todd McCarthy at The Hollywood Reporter. But it deserves attention: The Woman in Black is "a hoot of an old-fashioned British horror film," mining screams out of shadows, creaky noises, blink-and-you-miss-it ghosts, and "shrieking music cues pegged to startling cuts." And Radcliffe is "perfectly good" and "credible" (apart from his anachronistic facial stubble), "capable of holding the screen by himself for a long period, as required by his character's isolation."
"The Woman in Black: Film review"
C'mon. He's not that good: Radcliffe wisely chose a film that signals he's "outgrown his boy-wizard role," yet won't terrorize his tween fans with its "PG-13-level frights," says Rafer Guzman at Newsday. Too bad this rather monotonous movie squanders Radcliffe terribly, burdening him with a "stiff, morose," and emotionally "straitjacketed" character. When any of the few good scares arrive, Radcliffe lowers the voltage by reacting with "vague concern mixed with slight dismay." This should have launched a new chapter in Radcliffe's career, "but Voldemort himself couldn't have done a better job of squashing his magic."
"Radcliffe not magical in Woman in Black"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- How Israel's hawks intimidated and silenced the last remnants of the anti-war left
- Why China thinks it could defeat the U.S. in battle
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- The real lesson of Rick Perry's mug shot
- The big policy question libertarians can't answer
- What you need to know before you support the police in Ferguson
- What the 'death of the library' means for the future of books
- Welcome to the age of ambivalent feminism
- What is Molly? Everything you need to know about the party drug
Subscribe to the Week