"Clearly, Siri is Apple's most celebrated user feature," says Christina Bonnington at Wired. So why is the famed virtual assistant missing from the latest OS X update, Mountain Lion? Released last week for developers, the operating system update introduced several key features to streamline the Mac's desktop software with its mobile platforms, effectively making your computer more "iPad-like." Apple, however, has declined, so far, to include the iPhone 4S's talking assistant in other products. But if Siri is supposed to be a "game changer," what's holding Apple back? Here, 4 theories:
1. There's a microphone problem
There are several technical obstacles to getting Siri's voice-activated interface to work on a MacBook or iMac. "The iPhone is designed to be held up to your face," says Wired's Bonnington, and the 4S comes equipped with noise reduction technology in its microphone to make sure your voice registers clearly (and even then, Siri can mangle your instructions). But the built-in mic on your computer "doesn't offer the same voice-processing sensitivity" — at least not yet.
2. Siri would annoy your coworkers
The advantages a voice-powered assistant offers "are stronger on a small mobile device," software developer William Tunstall-Pedoe tells Wired (his company created a Siri-like clone called Evi). On a PC, you already have a much larger interface with a keyboard and mouse, so why issue commands with your mouth? Plus, "PCs are also often used in environments where the use of voice would be awkward" — like in a quiet open office, for instance.
3. A desktop Siri isn't ready for developers yet
It's a "curious thing" that Apple neglected to include Siri with Mountain Lion, especially since it's tied to a number of apps, including Notes, Reminders, and Messages, says Josh Lowensohn at CNET. One reason could be that Siri simply doesn't have a place on the desktop yet, but that's not really an excuse. The more "probable" answer is that Apple simply doesn't want to introduce voice-recognition to a desktop OS "without a way for developers to tap into it," as app developers are crucial to Apple's success.
4. Siri isn't as powerful as Google
Siri is great for doing short tasks like sending text messages or taking down notes. But it has more limited capabilities than robust search engines, says Bonnington. "Why would you have Siri look something up when you can more quickly run your own Google search?" But consider the possibilities of having advanced voice commands on your iMac, says Lex Friedman at Macworld. "Queries about the weather or stocks should work, and could probably surface the related dashboard widget we all know, love, and never visit." With a few tweaks, Apple could port Siri over to desktops. And based on speech-to-text dictation alone, "Siri on the Mac would be a huge accessibility win," says John Gruber at Daring Fireball. Let's hope Apple changes its thinking. And soon.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why is the Pentagon stuffing caves in Norway full of tanks?
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- The U.S. government is actually trouncing Ebola. When will it get credit?
- The one thing the New Atheists get right about religion
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Gamergate has backfired spectacularly on its nincompoop perpetrators
- The uncomfortable truth in The Giving Tree
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- 3 horrific inaccuracies in Homeland's depiction of Islamabad
- Syrian women know how to defeat ISIS
Subscribe to the Week