In the best-selling young-adult book, The Hunger Games, teens literally murder each other as part of a government-sponsored reality TV show. When Hollywood announced, months ago, that it was planning a PG-13 adaptation of the film, critics wondered how filmmakers would tone down the book's brutal violence without losing the resonance of the story. Fast-forward to March, 2012: The movie has snagged a PG-13 in America, but British censors felt the need to slash seven seconds of blood and gore to achieve a comparable rating — prompting a new debate: Will the movie be too violent for the book's younger fans?
Young kids should stay away: "There is a difference between gratuitous violence for the sake of violence and 'necessary violence,'" says Snarky Amber at Mama Pop. The Hunger Games' battles fall into the latter category; they're crucial to conveying the story's themes about "government, liberty, and revolution." Still, "it's one thing to read about horrible violence, and another to see it." You can bet some scenes will be "hard for younger viewers to handle." You'd be wise to leave kids 12 and under at home with a babysitter.
"Is The Hunger Games too violent for your kids?"
But the film doesn't glamorize the violence: The film could easily have earned an R rating if its bloody battle scenes had been shot traditionally, says Eric Goldman at IGN. Instead, director Gary Ross wisely employed a shaky, handheld, pseudo-documentary camera technique "to make things more abstract." The audience sees only flashes of weapons, and brief glimpses of blood splattering. Screams are left to speak for themselves, "[conveying] the horror of what is happening without showing it in graphic detail."
"The Hunger Games review"
Still, moviegoers will be shocked by the violence: The film's marketing has featured zero footage of the actual Hunger Games, concealing the most violent aspects of the film from the public, says Ben Fritz at the Los Angeles Times. Imagine "a Transformers trailer without any robots." The staggering tracking numbers indicate that the film's broad appeal extends well beyond those familiar with the books. And because the movie trailers are downplaying the potentially alienating violence, a large portion of the audience "could be surprised by the movie's violent content, particularly if they bring children." They should be warned.
"Hunger Games ads coyly don't show the Hunger Games"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why you should stop believing in evolution
- How Israel's hawks intimidated and silenced the last remnants of the anti-war left
- The real lesson of Rick Perry's mug shot
- Why China thinks it could defeat the U.S. in battle
- Welcome to the age of ambivalent feminism
- What the 'death of the library' means for the future of books
- The secret to handling pressure like astronauts, Navy SEALs, and samurai
- 10 things you need to know today: August 20, 2014
- The Catholic case for military strikes in Iraq
- How Republicans could win back Silicon Valley
Subscribe to the Week