Actress Ashley Judd (Heat, Double Jeopardy) is winning raves for her "blistering" response to recent criticisms of her physical appearance. Last month, photos of Judd's so-called "puffy face" triggered rumors that she'd undergone plastic surgery. The ensuing media frenzy inspired Judd, who currently stars in ABC's Missing, to pen an editorial for The Daily Beast addressing what Jezebel's Lindy West has dubbed "Judd-puff-mageddon 2012." Judd calls out the "sexist" news outlets who perpetuate "the assault on our body image, the hypersexualization of girls and women... and the general incessant objectification" of the female body. Here, a guide to the controversy, Judd's response, and whether anything will change:
How did this start?
While on a promotional tour for her new ABC drama Missing, Judd looked a little "puffy" in the face, according to some observers. "The media went right for the needles and knives," says Denise Restauri at Forbes of the plastic-surgery speculations. Us Weekly called her "nearly unrecognizable," while The Stir said she appeared "way chubbier than usual." Judd's rep clarified that the actress was treating a bad sinus infection with steroids — which can have a bloating effect — but that didn't quell the "bodysnarking."
What does Judd's editorial say?
Judd begins by saying that, while she usually refuses to read what's written about her, let alone weigh in, she felt she had no choice in this case. "The conversation was pointedly nasty, gendered, and misogynistic and embodies what all girls and women in our culture... endure every day, in ways both outrageous and subtle." She goes on to quote, without attributing sources, five recent criticisms of her appearance. "Who makes the fantastic leap from being sick... [to] plastic surgery?" she asks, concluding that "the insanity has to stop."
How are people reacting to her piece?
It's a "brave, biting, intelligent response" to a problem that has gotten out of control, says Donna Kaufman at iVillage. Moreover, a celebrity wrote it, says Julie Zeilinger, editor of feminist blog FBomb.org. Actresses are at the center of the troubling problem in which women are valued "only as much as their worst flaw, and Judd rightly asserted "that what the media is doing to her — and therefore, all women — is beyond being not okay." Most daring is how Judd calls out news outlets for which she has done "serious work," says Hadley Freeman at the U.K.'s Guardian — likely a reference to The Huffington Post, which once published a Judd-penned op-ed about preventing HIV.
Is everyone praising Judd?
No. While Judd makes important points about the harmful scrutiny women endure in our society, her piece "is not without its flaws," says Mary Elizabeth Williams at Salon. "She manages to come off as impossibly pleased with herself," as she counteracts the media's criticism by bragging about her "flawless skin," and name-dropping her various charitable causes.
Will the piece change anything?
"Maybe it will shame The Huffington Post into realizing that publishing serious news does not justify the screeds of celebrity gossip that contaminate the website," says Freeman, though that is probably wishful thinking. True, says Williams. One editorial won't keep tabloids from "their daily digging." But it certainly has me re-evaluating my practices, says West. "I'd rather sacrifice a few good jokes" than "contribute any more to the commodification and dehumanization of women."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Sorry, GOP, tax cuts don't pay for themselves
- How academia's liberal bias is killing social science
- Why Pakistan won't hunt down the terrorists within its borders
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Why the Sony hack changes everything
- Hey, bosses: Stop giving bonuses to your employees
- Why torture doesn't work: A definitive guide
- Can business succeed where the embargo failed in Cuba?
- Capitalism isn't a cure-all for Cuba
Subscribe to the Week