Almost exactly two years after BP's Deepwater Horizon oil-drilling rig exploded, killing 11 people and eventually sending more than 200 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, the Justice Department made its first arrest relating to the disaster on Tuesday. Federal investigators charged former BP engineer Kurt Mix, 50, with two criminal counts of obstructing justice for deleting hundreds of potentially damning text messages. What's the story with this curiously belated arrest? Here, a concise guide:
How was Mix involved in the disaster?
Until he resigned last June, Mix was a drilling engineer at BP. He was part of the several attempts to stanch the flow of oil as well as internal efforts to determine how much oil was gushing into the Gulf. According to prosecutors, Mix erased more than 200 text messages with his supervisor sent in October 2010, upon learning that BP's lawyers were requiring that all electronic communications related to the spill be kept and sent to directly to them; Mix deleted some 100 more in August 2011. Mix's lawyer, Joan McPhee, says the information in the texts was duplicated in emails and other documents Mix did preserve, making the "misguided" case an example of "startling government overreach."
What was in the deleted text messages?
The government says the erased messages, some of which were recovered forensically, include "sensitive internal BP information collected in real-time" about BP's failed efforts to seal the well, including the "top kill" operation that pumped heavy drilling mud down the well. In one text sent during the "top kill" attempt, Mix allegedly alerted his supervisor that the well had "too much flowrate — over 15,000 and too large an orifice." BP engineers had already determined that the "top kill" plan wouldn't work if 15,000 or more barrels per day of oil were gushing out, instead of the 5,000 BP was reporting to the public.
Why does that matter?
If the government can prove that BP was willfully withholding information about how much oil was gushing from the well, that could dramatically increase the fines the oil giant will have to pay for violating the Clean Water Act. But lying about the flow rate "obstructed more than justice," Harvard Law professor Richard Lazarus tells The New York Times. "It may have impeded the effort to contain the flow and allowed it to continue longer than it did, increasing the damage."
Will there be more arrests?
Yes, many more, says Paul M. Barrett at Bloomberg Businessweek. Deleted texts "may seem like small potatoes for the mighty U.S. Department of Justice," but the arrest suggests that "prosecutors are focusing on whether BP tried to cover up the size of the spill in an attempt to trim billions of dollars from its ultimate criminal environmental-law fine." In nabbing a relatively small fish like Mix, the feds are "trying to use what they have against some people as leverage to implicate higher-ranking people," says Harvard's Lazarus, who also worked on President Obama's BP oil-spill panel.
What kind of punishment could Mix face?
If convicted on both counts of obstruction of justice, he's looking at up to 20 years in prison and as much as $500,000 in fines. If Mix knows where the proverbial bodies are buried, and cooperates with the government, though, he'll get off much easier, says Businessweek's Barrett. In white collar cases, federal prosecutors typically "lean on small players in hopes that they will plead guilty in exchange for a more lenient sentence, and point a finger at people further up the corporate ladder." That's why Mix "drew the short straw and the very first criminal charges."
Why did it take two years to charge him?
Most likely because the federal Deepwater Horizon Task Force involves a handful of federal agencies, and these cases take a while to put together. But BP is also in the midst of settling several large civil suits, including one with the federal government, Natural Resources Defense Council attorney David Pettit tells the Los Angeles Times. BP is trying to lowball the spill figures, and the criminal charges can't hurt the feds' bargaining position. "If they can lead BP to think that Justice is starting to go up the chain, and that there will be more of these arrests, that might incentivize BP to up their offer a bit."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Bush vs. Clinton in 2016 is the perfect way to make millennials hate politics even more
- The latent sexism of the male marriage proposal
- After Ferguson: Stop deferring to the cops
- This judge is the reason we're still fighting over net neutrality
- The week's best photojournalism
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Is it now OK to have sex with animals?
- The hilarious hypocrisy of Republicans complaining about the imperial presidency
- The lessons of Japan's latest recession
Subscribe to the Week