The United Nations Security Council demanded Tuesday that Sudan halt air strikes against its fledgling and estranged sister nation, South Sudan. The Sudanese army denies bombing its neighbor, but South Sudan says Sudan has essentially "declared war." U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says she's "very concerned" about the fighting, and urges both sides to pull their troops back from their shared border and resume peace talks. Here are three things at stake in the tense showdown:
1. The prevailing side gets much sought after oil revenues
The conflict in the border region comes down to one thing: Oil, say Yara Bayoumy and Sabrina Mao at Reuters. When South Sudan became an independent nation last year, it got most of the former united Sudan's oil reserves, under a 2005 peace agreement. Ever since, the two nations "have been unable to resolve a dispute over oil revenues" and where the border lies in their crude-rich frontier region. South Sudan, which gets 98 percent of its government revenue from oil but must use pipelines to Sudan's ports to export it, renewed tensions recently by seizing Sudan's Heglig oil field. It has since withdrawn, at the urging of foreign powers, but the damage to the already fragile peace has been done.
2. War will make a humanitarian crisis worse
"It's not just the fighting that matters," says Oxfam's Pauline Ballman at CNN, "but also the enormous suffering it causes those who have already been forced to flee it." Sudan's 22-year civil war left 2 million people dead, and drove hundreds of thousands of refugees into camps in the border region and Ethiopia. Unless peace can be restored, all the "progress made in the years following the 2005 peace agreement risks being lost." If war resumes, says Rick Moran at The American Thinker, "more refugees, more starvation, and more massacres will probably be the result."
3. Both countries could lose vital foreign aid
Even with help from abroad, it's going to take up to two years to rebuild oil industry infrastructure, says Moran at The American Thinker, "so the economies of both countries are likely to remain comatose for at least that long." But if the fighting continues "promised western aid will almost certainly be halted." Then the only help Sudan and South Sudan will get is likely to be humanitarian aid, says Kevin Watkins at Britain's Guardian, which will mean fewer hospitals and schools, and "more poverty."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Watch out, China — America is working on dogfighting drones
- How liberals are unwittingly paving the way for the legalization of adult incest
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- How the Simpsons/Family Guy crossover revealed the worst of both shows
- The troubling persistence of eugenicist thought in modern America
- Why America won't have enough money to battle ISIS
- Why the Chinese military is only a paper dragon
- 6 things the happiest families all have in common
- Libertarianism's terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea
Subscribe to the Week