he GOP has long had a reputation as the national-security party. But there's a growing "rift between the U.S. military and the leadership of American conservatism," says Heather Hurlburt at Democracy Arsenal. Hardline politicians "who ritually stand up in front of the public and say they want to 'listen to the commanders,' [actually] ignore the commanders on issue after issue." Congressional Republicans, Hurlburt says, are arguing against Pentagon officials on everything from the threat of war with Iran, to military detention of terror suspects, to green energy initiatives designed to cut the armed forces' whopping fuel bills. Is the long love affair between Republicans and the military on the rocks?
Yes. Conservatives are actively thwarting the military: Republicans love peddling the conventional wisdom that they're pro-military and Democrats aren't, says Michael Tomasky at The Daily Beast. These days it's President Obama who's listening to the commanders, and Republicans who are "actively thwarting Pentagon planning and goals." Nowhere is this dissonance "weirder" than in GOP efforts to force the Pentagon to waste its money on "more expensive fuels (coal-to-liquid technology)" instead of making use of less expensive alternative fuels.
"Republicans against the Pentagon"
Actually, Republicans still support the Pentagon: Because Congress failed to cut the deficit last year, the military is facing $500 billion in automatic budget cuts over 10 years, says Owen Graham at The Foundry. "The stakes couldn't be higher for the Defense Department — and America's long-term national security." Military leaders and Republicans in Congress want to reverse the dangerous military cuts, but President Obama and his fellow Democrats are standing in the way.
"What U.S. Civilian and Military Leaders Are Saying About Defense Cuts"
The rift isn't complete, but it's real: Since the president and his commanders see eye-to-eye on so many things, a lot of this can be chalked up to the "radicalized" GOP's knee-jerk opposition to anything Obama favors, says Jonathan Bernstein at The Washington Post. The GOP should beware. If this continues, conservatives might risk "getting a reputation for lacking 'seriousness' on national security," and that's "awfully hard to shake." Just ask any Democrat.
"Unserious: The GOP and the Pentagon"
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why I'm a pro-life liberal
- If a nuclear bomb exploded in downtown Washington, what should you do?
- 10 things you need to know today: April 16, 2014
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Can these 4 couples really afford their dream houses?
- There's a number of reasons the grammar of this headline could infuriate you
- How to be more satisfied with your life, according to science
- The contentious policy at the heart of Cliven Bundy's armed standoff with the government
Subscribe to the Week