November's presidential election is still 160 days away, and "nobody can predict with any confidence what will happen" that far out, says Adam C. Smith in the Tampa Bay Times. But here's an educated guess: "Don't assume it will be close." Even though polling now shows President Obama and Mitt Romney running neck and neck, both nationally and in key swing states, somebody's going to win in a landslide. Why is the conventional wisdom about a November squeaker wrong? Here, an excerpt:
Polls show a razor-thin race at the moment, and after Florida decided the winner in 2000 and Ohio decided it in 2004, it's natural to assume this will be another squeaker. History suggests otherwise.
Presidential re-election campaigns are rarely close, as the electorate typically swings strongly one way or the other. Bush narrowly beat John Kerry in 2004, but that was the first close re-election race since 1916 when Woodrow Wilson narrowly won a second term against Republican Charles Fairbanks.
Based on historical precedent, come October the contest could well shift dramatically for or against Obama's re-election.
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- 43 TV shows to watch in 2014
- Obama just kneecapped Jeb Bush and Chris Christie's 2016 prospects
- It's official: The religious right is calling it quits
- How to be the most productive person in your office — and still get home by 5:30 p.m.
- Behind the newest attempt to get the Supreme Court to strike down affirmative action
- How science is accelerating our search for alien life
- The dangerously childish morality of liberal ObamaCare supporters
- Why insects are the future of food
- The Hunger Games: Mockingjay — Part 1: 10 major differences between the book and the movie
- The real story behind Deliver Us From Evil
Subscribe to the Week