fter months of deliberation, a controversial study from the Netherlands closely examining how the H5N1 virus, or bird flu, could be genetically altered and transmitted by mammals as an airborne pathogen was published on June 21. The paper wasn't immediately disseminated upon its completion because of widespread concerns that bioterrorists could use the information to engineer a weapon against people. (A similar U.S. study had been published shortly before the Dutch paper became public.) Here, a concise guide to the ordeal:
What's in the paper?
The research, published in the journal Science, details how Netherlands-based researchers engineered H5N1 to transmit among ferrets, which respond to bird flu much like humans do. Typically, the bird flu can only move from bird to human; human to human transmission is rare. In the experiment, scientists took three flu virus mutations that caused worldwide pandemics in the years 1918, 1957, and 1968, and applied them to the modern bird flu.
After scientists reinfected the ferrets multiple times, the virus was able to mutate enough to make it transmissible in the air. In other words, all it would take is a sneeze. Researchers believe this can be accomplished in as few as five mutations, although that number is admittedly "pretty difficult" to reach outside a laboratory. Such an outbreak, say researchers, could potentially kill 20 million to 150 million people worldwide.
Why publish the study if it's so dangerous?
In January, a U.S. biosecurity committee advised against the study's publication, while others said that the information should be closely guarded and limited to a select few. But scientists and health officials around the world argued that other susceptible countries could benefit from the study and learn how to fight the disease, which has killed nearly 60 percent of the 600 people known to have been infected since 2003. In February, the World Health Organization recommended that the U.S. and Dutch studies be published. In April, the National Institutes of Health complied. Supporters say that the scientific usefulness of the research "far outweighs the risk of nefarious" usage posed by potential terrorists.
Is there a cure for the virus?
It's "technologically possible," based on the genetic code of the H5N1 virus, to create a vaccine, says Elizabeth Landau at CNN, and several companies are already developing treatments. And now that research shows that it's possible for H5N1 to mutate and become airborne between non-birds, a cure could be crucial. "It is absolutely within the realm of possibility that they could evolve in a human host or some other mammalian host," says Derek Smith from the University of Cambridge, who co-authored a companion article on the virus for Science. "We see nothing — we see no fundamental hurdle to that happening." The issue, now, is determining whether the risk of an outbreak happening "is 1 in 1,000 or whether it's 1 in 100 million."
THE WEEK'S AUDIOPHILE PODCASTS: LISTEN SMARTER
- Why I'm a pro-life liberal
- If a nuclear bomb exploded in downtown Washington, what should you do?
- 31 TV shows to watch in 2014
- He said he was leaving. She ignored him.
- 10 things you need to know today: April 16, 2014
- How to be more satisfied with your life, according to science
- Can these 4 couples really afford their dream houses?
- What would a U.S.-Russia war look like?
- Israel and Russia are getting along. Have the neocons noticed?
- Why we can't stop procrastinating, according to science
Subscribe to the Week