Judge: Apple ads must say Samsung didn't copy patents
By The Week Staff | July 19, 2012
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 may be $50 more than the Kindle Fire, but it features the superior Android Ice Cream Sandwich OS and 50GB of Dropbox space for one year.
Samsung
I
n the latest patent war twist, a British judge has ordered Apple to publish notices in British papers and on its U.K. website saying that Samsung did not copy patents from the iPad. Earlier this month, Judge Colin Birss ruled that Samsung's tablets did not infringe on Apple's patented designs because they are simply "not as cool" as the iPad.
MOST READ
MOST SHARED
- My husband embezzled — and I went to jail
- Why are there two pronunciations for the letter 'G'?
- 32 TV shows to watch in 2013 [Updated]
- Before Midnight is the most important cinematic love story of all time
- Happy Memorial Day: Your BBQ grill may have more germs than a toilet seat
- Christians in the Arab world: A guide
- A linguistic dissection of 7 annoying teenage sounds
- Why NASA is funding a 3D pizza printer
- 5 ways the Samsung Galaxy S4 stunned an iPhone user
- How a female sex pill could save marriage
- How a female sex pill could save marriage
- Happy Memorial Day: Your BBQ grill may have more germs than a toilet seat
- Is Wall Street literally writing America's laws now?
- 5 ways the Samsung Galaxy S4 stunned an iPhone user
- The week's best editorial cartoons
- A linguistic dissection of 7 annoying teenage sounds
- Is it possible to think without language?
- Before Midnight is the most important cinematic love story of all time
- Operation Swill: New Jersey's top-shelf liquor scam
- 10 things you need to know today: May 25, 2013
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
